The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork
Abstract
Nonverbal communication plays an important role in coordinating teammates' actions for collaborative activities. In this paper, we explore the impact of non-verbal social cues and behavior on task performance by a human-robot team. We report our results from an experiment where naive human subjects guide a robot to perform a physical task using speech and gesture. Both self-report via questionnaire and behavioral analysis of video offer evidence to support our hypothesis that implicit non-verbal communication positively impacts human-robot task performance with respect to understandability of the robot, efficiency of task performance, and robustness to errors that arise from miscommunication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of verbal and non-verbal human–robot interactive communication
Mavridis, N. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.031 · Cited by 453
Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles
Takayama, L., Dooley, D., & Ju, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1957656.1957674 · Cited by 289
Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171268 · Cited by 233
(2015) · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696460 · Cited by 175
Deep learning-based cost-effective and responsive robot for autism treatment
Singh, A., Raj, K., Kumar, T., Verma, S., & Roy, A. (2023) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones7020081 · Cited by 154
Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction
Jung, M. F. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020224 · Cited by 142
Hamacher, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Pipe, A. G., & Eder, K. (2016) · 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/roman.2016.7745163 · Cited by 135
May I help you?: Design of Human-like Polite Approaching Behavior
Kato, Y., Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696463 · Cited by 130
A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction
Tian, L., & Oviatt, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3439720 · Cited by 133
Robot deictics: how gesture and context shape referential communication
Sauppé, A., & Mutlu, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction · doi:10.1145/2559636.2559657 · Cited by 93
Explainable goal-driven agents and robots-a comprehensive review
Sado, F., Loo, C. K., Liew, W. S., Kerzel, M., & Wermter, S. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3564240 · Cited by 79
“, transparency) of XGDAI was shown to enhance the quality of task performance [26] and to enable”
BackgroundKulms, P., & Kopp, S. (2019) · Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 · doi:10.1145/3340764.3340793 · Cited by 68
I'm sorry, Dave: i'm afraid i won't do that: social aspects of human-agent conflict
Takayama, L., Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1519021 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Breazeal, C., Kidd, C. D., Thomaz, A. L., Hoffman, G., & Berlin, M.
- Venue
- 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 708-713
- OpenAlex
- W2024649868
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
