The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A robust and modular multi-sensor fusion approach applied to MAV navigation
Open accessAbstract
It has been long known that fusing information from multiple sensors for robot navigation results in increased robustness and accuracy. However, accurate calibration of the sensor ensemble prior to deployment in the field as well as coping with sensor outages, different measurement rates and delays, render multi-sensor fusion a challenge. As a result, most often, systems do not exploit all the sensor information available in exchange for simplicity. For example, on a mission requiring transition of the robot from indoors to outdoors, it is the norm to ignore the Global Positioning System (GPS) signals which become freely available once outdoors and instead, rely only on sensor feeds (e.g., vision and laser) continuously available throughout the mission. Naturally, this comes at the expense of robustness and accuracy in real deployment. This paper presents a generic framework, dubbed MultiSensor-Fusion Extended Kalman Filter (MSF-EKF), able to process delayed, relative and absolute measurements from a theoretically unlimited number of different sensors and sensor types, while allowing self-calibration of the sensor-suite online. The modularity of MSF-EKF allows seamless handling of additional/lost sensor signals during operation while employing a state buffering scheme augmented with Iterated EKF (IEKF) updates to allow for efficient re-linearization of the prediction to get near optimal linearization points for both absolute and relative state updates. We demonstrate our approach in outdoor navigation experiments using a Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAV) equipped with a GPS receiver as well as visual, inertial, and pressure sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Cited by
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669
SVO: Fast semi-direct monocular visual odometry
Forster, C., Pizzoli, M., & Scaramuzza, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6906584 · Cited by 2,205
RotorS—A Modular Gazebo MAV Simulator Framework
Furrer, F., Burri, M., Achtelik, M., & Siegwart, R. (2016) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26054-9_23 · Cited by 592
Self-citationTightly Coupled 3D Lidar Inertial Odometry and Mapping
Ye, H., Chen, Y., & Liu, M. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793511 · Cited by 574
GVINS: Tightly Coupled GNSS–Visual–Inertial Fusion for Smooth and Consistent State Estimation
Cao, S., Lu, X., & Shen, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2021.3133730 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynen, S., Achtelik, M. W., Weiss, S., Chli, M., & Siegwart, R.
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-11
- Pages
- 3923-3929
- OpenAlex
- W2127752689
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A robust and modular multi-sensor fusion approach applied to MAV navigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iros.2013.6696917
- The paper
- Lynen, S., Achtelik, M. W., Weiss, S., Chli, M., & Siegwart, R. (2013). A robust and modular multi-sensor fusion approach applied to MAV navigation. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2013.6696917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.