The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Extrinsic Calibration of a Camera and a 3D LiDAR Using Line and Plane Correspondences
Abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of extrinsic calibration of a camera and a 3D Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor using a checkerboard. Unlike previous works which require at least three checkerboard poses, our algorithm reduces the minimal number of poses to one by combining 3D line and plane correspondences. Besides, we prove that parallel planar targets with parallel boundaries provide the same constraints in our algorithm. This allows us to place the checkerboard close to the LiDAR so that the laser points better approximate the target boundary without loss of generality. Moreover, we present an algorithm to estimate the similarity transformation between the LiDAR and the camera for the applications where only the correspondences between laser points and pixels are concerned. Using a similarity transformation can simplify the calibration process since the physical size of the checkerboard is not needed. Meanwhile, estimating the scale can yield a more accurate result due to the inevitable measurement errors of the checkerboard size and the LiDAR intrinsic scale factor that transforms the LiDAR measurement to the metric measurement. Our algorithm is validated through simulations and experiments. Compared to the plane-only algorithms, our algorithm can obtain more accurate result by fewer number of poses. This is beneficial to the large-scale commercial application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
A flexible new technique for camera calibration
Zhang, Z. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.888718 · Cited by 15,004
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955 · cited 1×
“In [30], they solve the extrinsic calibration problem by minimizing the SURF descriptor [31] error of the projection of the laser points among different frames.”
The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory
Moré, J. J. (1978) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0067700 · Cited by 5,773
Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets
Arun, K. S., Huang, T. S., & Blostein, S. D. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1987.4767965 · Cited by 3,952
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1987) · Readings in Computer Vision · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051581-6.50070-2 · Cited by 2,122
LSD: A Fast Line Segment Detector with a False Detection Control
von Gioi, R. G., Jakubowicz, J., Morel, J.-M., & Randall, G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.300 · Cited by 1,946
Extrinsic calibration of a camera and laser range finder (improves camera calibration)
Zhang, Q., & Pless, R. (2005) · 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566) · doi:10.1109/iros.2004.1389752 · Cited by 681
Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot
Geiger, A., Moosmann, F., Car, O., & Schuster, B. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra.2012.6224570 · Cited by 647
Joint Depth and Color Camera Calibration with Distortion Correction
Herrera C., D., Kannala, J., & Heikkila, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.125 · Cited by 453
Cited by
Emerging trends in autonomous vehicle perception: Multimodal fusion for 3D object detection
Alaba, S. Y., Gurbuz, A. C., & Ball, J. E. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15010020 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Li, Z., & Kaess, M.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-10
- Pages
- 5562-5569
- OpenAlex
- W2909816247
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 28.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Extrinsic Calibration of a Camera and a 3D LiDAR Using Line and Plane Correspondences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iros.2018.8593660
- The paper
- Zhou, L., Li, Z., & Kaess, M. (2018). Automatic Extrinsic Calibration of a Camera and a 3D LiDAR Using Line and Plane Correspondences. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2018.8593660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.