Cited by 19Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsRobot Manipulation and Learning

Cascaded Gaussian Processes for Data-efficient Robot Dynamics Learning

Open access
Rezaei-Shoshtari, Sahand, Meger, David, Sharf, Inna·2019·2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

Motivated by the recursive Newton-Euler formulation, we propose a novel cascaded Gaussian process learning framework for the inverse dynamics of robot manipulators. This approach leads to a significant dimensionality reduction which in turn results in better learning and data efficiency. We explore two formulations for the cascading: the inward and outward, both along the manipulator chain topology. The learned modeling is tested in conjunction with the classical inverse dynamics model (semi-parametric) and on its own (non-parametric) in the context of feed-forward control of the arm. Experimental results are obtained with Jaco 2 six-DOF and SARCOS seven-DOF manipulators for randomly defined sinusoidal motions of the joints in order to evaluate the performance of cascading against the standard GP learning. In addition, experiments are conducted using Jaco 2 on a task emulating a pouring maneuver. Results indicate a consistent improvement in learning speed with the inward cascaded GP model and an overall improvement in data efficiency and generalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros40897.2019.8968107

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is sufficient for non-bilateral teleoperation.

    “A teleoperation frequency of 50Hz is common among other non-bilateral systems [7, 50, 39] and in practice demonstrates sufficient performance.”

    From Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware (2023) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Setup section (page unavailable) says the robot’s torque controller runs at 40 Hz, but does not describe a teleoperation system. The Training section mentions a dataset collected at 50 Hz, not a teleoperation frequency. Searches for non-bilateral teleoperation and sufficient performance at 50 Hz found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. Featherstone and D. E. Orin, "Dynamics," in Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, 2016, pp. 37-66.
  2. A. Dalla Libera, E. Tosello, R. Carli, G. Pillonetto, and S. Ghidoni, "A semi-parametric robot inverse dynamics estimator with friction compensation for human-robot interaction," in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezaei-Shoshtari, S., Meger, D., & Sharf, I.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-11
Pages
6871-6877
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2978369754
Cited by
19
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
robot manipulators, data-efficient learning, dimensionality reduction, feedforward control, nonparametric models, generalization, pouring task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review