Cited by 503Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningRobotic Locomotion and Control

Model learning for robot control: A survey

Nguyen-Tuong, Duy, Peters, Jan·2011·Cognitive Processing

Abstract

Models are among the most essential tools in robotics, such as kinematics and dynamics models of the robot's own body and controllable external objects. It is widely believed that intelligent mammals also rely on internal models in order to generate their actions. However, while classical robotics relies on manually generated models that are based on human insights into physics, future autonomous, cognitive robots need to be able to automatically generate models that are based on information which is extracted from the data streams accessible to the robot. In this paper, we survey the progress in model learning with a strong focus on robot control on a kinematic as well as dynamical level. Here, a model describes essential information about the behavior of the environment and the influence of an agent on this environment. In the context of model-based learning control, we view the model from three different perspectives. First, we need to study the different possible model learning architectures for robotics. Second, we discuss what kind of problems these architecture and the domain of robotics imply for the applicable learning methods. From this discussion, we deduce future directions of real-time learning algorithms. Third, we show where these scenarios have been used successfully in several case studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10339-011-0404-1

Cites

196 of 196 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen-Tuong, D., & Peters, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Nguyen-Tuong, Duy
  • Peters, Jan
Venue
Cognitive Processing
Published
2011-04-13
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
319-340
ISSN
  • 1612-4782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4790
OpenAlex
W1997543377
Cited by
503
References
196
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
Keywords
model learning, robot control, robot kinematics, robot dynamics, internal models, learning architecture
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Problem Solving, Robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review