Cited by 15Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsSurgical Simulation and TrainingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Multi-Modal Learning from Video, Eye Tracking, and Pupillometry for Operator Skill Characterization in Clinical Fetal Ultrasound

Open access
Sharma, Harshita, Drukker, Lior, Papageorghiou, Aris T., Noble, J. Alison·2021·2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel multi-modal learning approach for automated skill characterization of obstetric ultrasound operators using heterogeneous spatio-temporal sensory cues, namely, scan video, eye-tracking data, and pupillometric data, acquired in the clinical environment. We address pertinent challenges such as combining heterogeneous, small-scale and variable-length sequential datasets, to learn deep convolutional neural networks in real-world scenarios. We propose spatial encoding for multi-modal analysis using sonography standard plane images, spatial gaze maps, gaze trajectory images, and pupillary response images. We present and compare five multi-modal learning network architectures using late, intermediate, hybrid, and tensor fusion. We build models for the Heart and the Brain scanning tasks, and performance evaluation suggests that multi-modal learning networks outperform uni-modal networks, with the best-performing model achieving accuracies of 82.4% (Brain task) and 76.4% (Heart task) for the operator skill classification problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433863

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, H., Drukker, L., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-04-13
Volume
2021
Pages
1646-1649
OpenAlex
W3163992391
Cited by
15
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
12.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
multimodal learning, eye tracking, pupillometry, gaze trajectories, skill classification, tensor fusion, deep convolutional neural networks, prenatal ultrasound

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review