Cited by 67Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance DevicesNeural Networks and Applications

ReRAM-based synaptic device for neuromorphic computing

Jang, Jun-Woo, Park, Sangsu, Jeong, Yoon-Ha, Hwang, Hyunsang·2014·2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)

Abstract

To compete with nonvolatile FLASH memory technology, we need to develop stackable, cross-point ReRAM device. Although various materials have been reported, it is difficult to meet device criteria such as high speed operation, low power switching, switching uniformity, endurance, long-term retention and selection device for cross-point array. We have investigated various ReRAM devices to meet the nonvolatile memory requirements. We developed wafer scale PCMO-ReRAM devices which exhibit excellent switching uniformity and analog memory behavior. Using PCMO-ReRAM, we can implement analog artificial synapse characteristics for neuromorphic systems. We demonstrated the optimum ReRAM synapse characteristics which are suitable for the neuromorphic application. We compared the time series prediction and face recognition function with varying potentiation and depression characteristics of ReRAM synapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iscas.2014.6865320

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many materials, such as PCM, ReRAM, CBRAM, or ECRAM, conductances are effectively continuous physical quantities, and stored weights are not quantized.

    “In many materials, such as phase-change memory (PCM)22,23, resistive random-access memory (ReRAM)24,25, conductive bridge RAM (CBRAM)26,27, or electro-chemical random-access memory (ECRAM)28,29, these conductances are effectively continuous physical quantities, and stored weights are not quantized.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, J.-W., Park, S., Jeong, Y.-H., & Hwang, H.
Affiliations
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
1054-1057
ISSN
0271-4302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070090854
Cited by
67
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
resistive random access memory, neuromorphic computing, artificial synapses, cross-point memory arrays, non-volatile memory, switching uniformity, synaptic potentiation and depression, time series forecasting, face recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review