CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Innovations and Challenges

Student Perceptions on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education

Ravi Kumar, V V, Raman, Ramakrishnan·2022·2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
DOI 10.1109/isec54952.2022.10025165
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This purpose of this study was to understand the student perceptions on the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education. AI could form part of higher education in multiple ways whether it be in the Teaching Learning process, Admission process, the Placement process or the Administrative process. The paper brings out the student perceptions on AI usage in business schools from those enrolled in full time program in business management. Online questioner was used to collect both quantitative and qualitative response. Data was collected from 682 student and statistical analysis have been used for arriving at conclusions. Ordination regression and correlation have been used for analysis of the data collect. The qualitative response was helpful to get the views that students have. The results indicate that student have a perception that AI can be effectively used in teaching learning process, academic administration processes, and should not be used in a few processes related to admission, examination and placements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isec54952.2022.10025165

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student perceptions on the use of AI are diverse, with support for its use as a learning assistant but concerns about its use in assessments.

    “Student perceptions on the use of AI are diverse, with support for its use as a learning assistant but concerns about its use in assessments (Kumar & Raman, 2022).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Kumar & Raman, 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ravi Kumar, V. V., & Raman, R.
Affiliations
  • Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Pune Symbiosis International (Deemed University),Pune,India
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
ORCID
Raman, Ramakrishnan
Venue
2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-03-26
Pages
450-454
DOI
10.1109/isec54952.2022.10025165
OpenAlex
W4318710913
Cited by
51
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6
FWCI
9.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, student perceptions, business schools, business administration students, AI in teaching and learning, university administration, university admission, student placement, examinations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review