Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

BioBench: A Benchmark Suite of Bioinformatics Applications

Albayraktaroglu, K., Jaleel, A., Xue Wu, Franklin, M., Jacob, B., Chau-Wen Tseng, Yeung, D.·2005·IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2005. ISPASS 2005.

Abstract

Recent advances in bioinformatics and the significant increase in computational power available to researchers have made it possible to make better use of the vast amounts of genetic data that has been collected over the last two decades. As the uses of genetic data expand to include drug discovery and development of gene-based therapies, bioinformatics is destined to take its place in the forefront of scientific computing application domains. Despite the clear importance of this field, common bioinformatics applications and their implication on microarchitectural design have received scant attention from the computer architecture community so far. The availability of a common set of bioinformatics benchmarks could be the first step to motivate further research in this crucial area. To this end, this paper presents BioBench, a benchmark suite that represents a diverse set of bioinformatics applications. The first version of BioBench includes applications from different application domains, with a particular emphasis on mature genomics applications. The applications in the benchmark are described briefly, and basic execution characteristics obtained on a real processor are presented. Compared to SPEC INT and SPEC FP benchmarks, applications in BioBench display a higher percentage of load/store instructions, almost negligible floating-point operation content, and higher IPC than either SPEC INT or SPEC FP applications. Our evaluation suggests that bioinformatics applications have distinctly different characteristics from the applications in both of the mentioned SPEC suites; and our findings indicate that bioinformatics workloads can benefit from architectural improvements to memory bandwidth and techniques that exploit their high levels of ILP. The entire BioBench suite and accompanying reference data will be made freely available to researchers

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ispass.2005.1430554

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Albayraktaroglu, K., Jaleel, A., Wu, X., Franklin, M., Jacob, B., Tseng, C.-W., & Yeung, D.
Venue
IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2005. ISPASS 2005.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005
Pages
2-9
OpenAlex
W2126716774
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
9.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BioBench: A Benchmark Suite of Bioinformatics Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ispass.2005.1430554
The paper
Albayraktaroglu, K., Jaleel, A., Wu, X., Franklin, M., Jacob, B., Tseng, C.-W., & Yeung, D. (2005). BioBench: A Benchmark Suite of Bioinformatics Applications. IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2005. ISPASS 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ispass.2005.1430554

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.