The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware
Open accessAbstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) typically consist of sensor nodes and gateways that operate on devices with limited resources. As a result, WSNs require bandwidth-efficient and energy-efficient application protocols for data transmission. Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) are two such protocols proposed for resource-constrained devices. In this paper, we design and implement a common middleware that supports MQTT and CoAP and provides a common programming interface. We design the middleware to be extensible to support future protocols. Using the common middleware, we conducted experiments to study the performance of MQTT and CoAP in terms of end-to-end delay and bandwidth consumption. Experimental results reveal that MQTT messages have lower delay than CoAP messages at lower packet loss rates and higher delay than CoAP messages at higher loss rates. Moreover, when the message size is small and the loss rate is equal to or less than 25%, CoAP generates lower additional traffic than MQTT to ensure message reliability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
A Survey on 5G Networks for the Internet of Things: Communication Technologies and Challenges
Akpakwu, G. A., Silva, B. J., Hancke, G. P., & Abu-Mahfouz, A. M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2779844 · Cited by 1,293
Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP
Naik, N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE) · doi:10.1109/syseng.2017.8088251 · Cited by 727
Fog Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Survey
Perera, C., Qin, Y., Estrella, J. C., Reiff-Marganiec, S., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3057266 · Cited by 459
The Use of MQTT in M2M and IoT Systems: A Survey
Mishra, B., & Kertesz, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3035849 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Thangavel, D., Ma, X., Valera, A., Tan, H.-X., & Tan, C. K.-Y.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-04
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W1973906278
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/issnip.2014.6827678
- The paper
- Thangavel, D., Ma, X., Valera, A., Tan, H.-X., & Tan, C. K.-Y. (2014). Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware. 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP). https://doi.org/10.1109/issnip.2014.6827678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.