Cited by 122Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Precise Synthetic Image and LiDAR (PreSIL) Dataset for Autonomous Vehicle Perception

Open access
Hurl, Braden, Czarnecki, Krzysztof, Waslander, Steven·2019·2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)

Abstract

We introduce the Precise Synthetic Image and LiDAR (PreSIL) dataset for autonomous vehicle perception. Grand Theft Auto V (GTA V), a commercial video game, has a large detailed world with realistic graphics, which provides a diverse data collection environment. Existing works creating synthetic LiDAR data for autonomous driving with GTA V have not released their datasets, rely on an in-game raycasting function which represents people as cylinders, and can fail to capture vehicles past 30 metres. Our work creates a precise LiDAR simulator within GTA V which collides with detailed models for all entities no matter the type or position. The PreSIL dataset consists of over 50,000 frames and includes high-definition images with full resolution depth information, semantic segmentation (images), point-wise segmentation (point clouds), and detailed annotations for all vehicles and people. Collecting additional data with our framework is entirely automatic and requires no human annotation of any kind. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our dataset by showing an improvement of up to 5% average precision on the KITTI 3D Object Detection benchmark challenge when state-of-the-art 3D object detection networks are pre-trained with our data. The data and code are available at https://tinyurl.com/y3tb9sxy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ivs.2019.8813809

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M. Racinsky, "3d map estimation from a single rgb image," Master's thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurl, B., Czarnecki, K., & Waslander, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
2522-2529
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942740757
Cited by
122
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
13.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
autonomous driving perception, Grand Theft Auto V, point cloud segmentation, semantic segmentation, 3D object detection, KITTI dataset, synthetic image dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review