Cited by 205Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAutomated Road and Building ExtractionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Progressive LiDAR adaptation for road detection

Open access
Chen, Zhe, Zhang, Jing, Tao, Dacheng·2019·IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

Abstract

Despite rapid developments in visual image-based road detection, robustly identifying road areas in visual images remains challenging due to issues like illumination changes and blurry images. To this end, LiDAR sensor data can be incorporated to improve the visual image-based road detection, because LiDAR data is less susceptible to visual noises. However, the main difficulty in introducing LiDAR information into visual image-based road detection is that LiDAR data and its extracted features do not share the same space with the visual data and visual features. Such gaps in spaces may limit the benefits of LiDAR information for road detection. To overcome this issue, we introduce a novel Progressive LiDAR adaptation-aided road detection (PLARD) approach to adapt LiDAR information into visual image-based road detection and improve detection performance. In PLARD, progressive LiDAR adaptation consists of two subsequent modules: 1) data space adaptation, which transforms the LiDAR data to the visual data space to align with the perspective view by applying altitude difference-based transformation; and 2) feature space adaptation, which adapts LiDAR features to visual features through a cascaded fusion structure. Comprehensive empirical studies on the well-known KITTI road detection benchmark demonstrate that PLARD takes advantage of both the visual and LiDAR information, achieving much more robust road detection even in challenging urban scenes. In particular, PLARD outperforms other state-of-the-art road detection models and is currently top of the publicly accessible benchmark leader-board.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jas.2019.1911459

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [27][27] D. Munoz, J. A. Bagnell, and M. Hebert, 'Stacked hier- - archical labeling,' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) . Springer, 2010, pp. 57-70. -
  2. [34][34] C. Liang-Chieh, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A. Yuille, 'Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected crfs,' in ICLR , 2015. -
  3. [39][39] G. L. Oliveira, W. Burgard, and T. Brox, 'Efficient deep methods for monocular road segmentation.' in IROS , 2016. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Z., Zhang, J., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Venue
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Published
2019-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
693-702
ISSN
  • 2329-9266 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9274
OpenAlex
W2932012013
Cited by
205
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Automated Road and Building Extraction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
road detection, LiDAR, domain adaptation, KITTI dataset, urban scenes, illumination variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review