Cited by 119Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

A Hybrid Ensemble Deep Learning Approach for Early Prediction of Battery Remaining Useful Life

Xu, Qing, Wu, Min, Khoo, Edwin, Chen, Zhenghua, Li, Xiaoli·2023·IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is critical for their large-scale deployment as energy storage devices in electric vehicles and stationary storage. A fundamental understanding of the factors affecting RUL is crucial for accelerating battery technology development. However, it is very challenging to predict RUL accurately because of complex degradation mechanisms occurring within the batteries, as well as dynamic operating conditions in practical applications. Moreover, due to insignificant capacity degradation in early stages, early prediction of battery life with early cycle data can be more difficult. In this paper, we propose a hybrid deep learning model for early prediction of battery RUL. The proposed method can effectively combine handcrafted features with domain knowledge and latent features learned by deep networks to boost the performance of RUL early prediction. We also design a non-linear correlation-based method to select effective domain knowledge-based features. Moreover, a novel snapshot ensemble learning strategy is proposed to further enhance model generalization ability without increasing any additional training cost. Our experimental results show that the proposed method not only outperforms other approaches in the primary test set having a similar distribution as the training set, but also generalizes well to the secondary test set having a clearly different distribution with the training set. The PyTorch implementation of our proposed approach is available at https://github.com/batteryrullbattery_rul_early_prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jas.2023.123024

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid models in battery SOH estimation improve estimation accuracy and reliability by integrating different types of models.

    “By integrating different types of models, these methods can handle the diverse characteristics of battery data, improving both estimation accuracy and reliability.59”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Q., Wu, M., Khoo, E., Chen, Z., & Li, X.
Affiliations
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Venue
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Published
2023-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
177-187
ISSN
  • 2329-9266 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9274
OpenAlex
W4313598793
Cited by
119
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, hybrid deep learning model, ensemble learning, snapshot ensemble, feature selection, capacity fade, distribution shift, battery degradation modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review