Cited by 78Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsMachine Learning and AlgorithmsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

DAO to HANOI via DeSci: AI Paradigm Shifts from AlphaGo to ChatGPT

Miao, Qinghai, Zheng, Wenbo, Lv, Yisheng, Huang, Min, Ding, Wenwen, Wang, Fei-Yue·2023·IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

Abstract

From AlphaGo to ChatGPT, the field of AI has launched a series of remarkable achievements in recent years. Analyzing, comparing, and summarizing these achievements at the paradigm level is important for future AI innovation, but has not received sufficient attention. In this paper, we give an overview and perspective on machine learning paradigms. First, we propose a paradigm taxonomy with three levels and seven dimensions from a knowledge perspective. Accordingly, we give an overview on three basic and twelve extended learning paradigms, such as Ensemble Learning, Transfer Learning, etc., with figures in unified style. We further analyze three advanced paradigms, i.e., AlphaGo, AlphaFold and ChatGPT. Second, to enable more efficient and effective scientific discovery, we propose to build a new ecosystem that drives AI paradigm shifts through the decentralized science (DeSci) movement based on decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). To this end, we design the Hanoi framework, which integrates human factors, parallel intelligence based on a combination of artificial systems and the natural world, and the DAO to inspire AI innovations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jas.2023.123561

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combination of different data types processed concurrently enables multimodal models to provide a holistic view, making them especially effective in applications requiring deep and multifaceted understanding of complex scenarios.

    “The combination of different data types, processed concurrently, enables these models to provide a holistic view, making them especially effective in applications that require a deep and multifaceted understanding of complex scenarios [113], [161], [162], [160].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miao, Q., Zheng, W., Lv, Y., Huang, M., Ding, W., & Wang, F.-Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
Venue
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Published
2023-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
877-897
ISSN
  • 2329-9266 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9274
OpenAlex
W4361030007
Cited by
78
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB2104001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62271485,61903363,U1811463)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
machine learning paradigms, AlphaGo, AlphaFold, ChatGPT, ensemble learning, transfer learning, decentralized science, decentralized autonomous organizations, scientific discovery, human-AI integration, parallel intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review