Cited by 66EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsEpilepsy research and treatment

Accelerometry-Based Home Monitoring for Detection of Nocturnal Hypermotor Seizures Based on Novelty Detection

Open access
Cuppens, Kris, Karsmakers, Peter, Van de Vel, Anouk, Bonroy, Bert, Milosevic, Milica, Luca, Stijn, Croonenborghs, Tom, Ceulemans, Berten +3 more·2014·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Nocturnal home monitoring of epileptic children is often not feasible due to the cumbersome manner of seizure monitoring with the standard method of video/EEG-monitoring. We propose a method for hypermotor seizure detection based on accelerometers attached to the extremities. From the acceleration signals, multiple temporal, frequency, and wavelet-based features are extracted. After determining the features with the highest discriminative power, we classify movement events in epileptic and nonepileptic movements. This classification is only based on a nonparametric estimate of the probability density function of normal movements. Such approach allows us to build patient-specific models to classify movement data without the need for seizure data that are rarely available. If, in the test phase, the probability of a data point (event) is lower than a threshold, this event is considered to be an epileptic seizure; otherwise, it is considered as a normal nocturnal movement event. The mean performance over seven patients gives a sensitivity of 95.24% and a positive predictive value of 60.04%. However, there is a noticeable interpatient difference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2013.2285015

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuppens, K., Karsmakers, P., Van de Vel, A., Bonroy, B., Milosevic, M., Luca, S., Croonenborghs, T., Ceulemans, B., Lagae, L., Van Huffel, S., & Vanrumste, B.
Affiliations
  • Thomas More Kempen (BE)
  • University Hospital of Antwerp , Wilrijkstraat, Belgium
  • Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) STADIUS and iMinds Future Health Department, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2014-05
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1026-1033
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2021350343
Cited by
66
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Council KUL: GOA-MANET, IWT: TBM070713-Accelero, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office IUAP P6/04 (DYSCO, Dynamical systems, control and optimization, 2007-2011); EU: Neuromath (COSTBM0601)
  • Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
seizure detection, accelerometry, home monitoring, pediatric epilepsy, novelty detection, nonparametric density estimation, patient-specific models, wavelet features, frequency-domain features, interpatient variability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Movement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Models, Statistical, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review