Cited by 41EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Automatic Detection and Classification of Convulsive Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures Using a Wearable Device

Gubbi, Jayavardhana, Kusmakar, Shitanshu, Rao, Aravinda S., Yan, Bernard, OBrien, Terence, Palaniswami, Marimuthu·2016·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders and patients suffer from unprovoked seizures. In contrast, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are another class of seizures that are involuntary events not caused by abnormal electrical discharges but are a manifestation of psychological distress. The similarity of these two types of seizures poses diagnostic challenges that often leads in delayed diagnosis of PNES. Further, the diagnosis of PNES involves high-cost hospital admission and monitoring using video-electroencephalogram machines. A wearable device that can monitor the patient in natural setting is a desired solution for diagnosis of convulsive PNES. A wearable device with an accelerometer sensor is proposed as a new solution in the detection and diagnosis of PNES. The seizure detection algorithm and PNES classification algorithm are developed. The developed algorithms are tested on data collected from convulsive epileptic patients. A very high seizure detection rate is achieved with 100% sensitivity and few false alarms. A leave-one-out error of 6.67% is achieved in PNES classification, demonstrating the usefulness of wearable device in the diagnosis of PNES.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2446539

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gubbi, J., Kusmakar, S., Rao, A. S., Yan, B., OBrien, T., & Palaniswami, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2016-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
1061-1072
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W639409994
Cited by
41
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, convulsions, seizure detection, seizure classification, wearable devices, acceleration sensors, epilepsy diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Clothing, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Seizures, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cluster Analysis, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review