Cited by 39Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The use of a finger-worn accelerometer for monitoring of hand use in ambulatory settings

Liu, Xin, Rajan, Smita, Ramasarma, Nathan, Bonato, Paolo, Lee, Sunghoon Ivan·2019·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Objective assessment of stroke survivors' upper limb movements in ambulatory settings can provide clinicians with important information regarding the real impact of rehabilitation outside the clinic and help to establish individually-tailored therapeutic programs. This paper explores a novel approach to monitor the amount of hand use, which is relevant to the purposeful, goal-directed use of the limbs, based on a body networked sensor system composed of miniaturized finger- and wrist-worn accelerometers. The main contributions of this paper are twofold. First, this paper introduces and validates a new benchmark measurement of the amount of hand use based on data recorded by a motion capture system, the gold standard for human movement analysis. Second, this paper introduces a machine learning-based analytic pipeline that estimates the amount of hand use using data obtained from the wearable sensors and validates its estimation performance against the aforementioned benchmark measurement. Based on data collected from 18 neurologically intact individuals performing 11 motor tasks resembling various activities of daily living, the analytic results presented herein show that our new benchmark measure is reliable and responsive, and that the proposed wearable system can yield an accurate estimation of the amount of hand use (normalized root mean square error of 0.11 and average Pearson correlation of 0.78). This study has the potential to open up new research and clinical opportunities for monitoring hand function in ambulatory settings, ultimately enabling evidence-based, patient-centered rehabilitation and healthcare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2821136

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Rajan, S., Ramasarma, N., Bonato, P., & Lee, S. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2019-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
599-606
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2794850934
Cited by
39
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
wearable sensors, stroke rehabilitation, upper limb movement, ambulatory activity monitoring, machine learning estimation, activities of daily living, wrist-worn accelerometers
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Fingers, Hand, Humans, Movement, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review