The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards End-to-End ECG Classification With Raw Signal Extraction and Deep Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes deep learning methods with signal alignment that facilitate the end-to-end classification of raw electrocardiogram (ECG) signals into heartbeat types, i.e., normal beat or different types of arrhythmias. Time-domain sample points are extracted from raw ECG signals, and consecutive vectors are extracted from a sliding time-window covering these sample points. Each of these vectors comprises the consecutive sample points of a complete heartbeat cycle, which includes not only the QRS complex but also the P and T waves. Unlike existing heartbeat classification methods in which medical doctors extract handcrafted features from raw ECG signals, the proposed end-to-end method leverages a deep neural network for both feature extraction and classification based on aligned heartbeats. This strategy not only obviates the need to handcraft the features but also produces optimized ECG representation for heartbeat classification. Evaluations on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database show that at the same specificity, the proposed patient-independent classifier can detect supraventricular- and ventricular-ectopic beats at a sensitivity that is at least 10% higher than current state-of-the-art methods. More importantly, there is a wide range of operating points in which both the sensitivity and specificity of the proposed classifier are higher than those achieved by state-of-the-art classifiers. The proposed classifier can also perform comparable to patient-specific classifiers, but at the same time enjoys the advantage of patient independence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm
Pan, J., & Tompkins, W. J. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1985.325532 · Cited by 7,855
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) [33], [34] is a better measure for imbalanced datasets.”
BackgroundGreedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Cited by
Hannun, A. Y., Rajpurkar, P., Haghpanahi, M., Tison, G. H., Bourn, C., Turakhia, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3 · Cited by 3,148
Subject-Aware Contrastive Learning for Biosignals
Cheng, J. Y., Goh, H., Dogrusoz, K., Tuzel, O., & Azemi, E. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04871 · Cited by 74
A Neural Network-Based ECG Classification Processor With Exploitation of Heartbeat Similarity
Wu, J., Li, F., Chen, Z., Pu, Y., & Zhan, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2956179 · Cited by 23
A comprehensive review of AI-Based detection of Arrhythmia using Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Ayyub, A., Politis, C., & Usman, M. A. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110594 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, S. S., Mak, M.-W., & Cheung, C.-C.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1574-1584
- ISSN
- 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2208
- OpenAlex
- W2891342985
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards End-to-End ECG Classification With Raw Signal Extraction and Deep Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jbhi.2018.2871510
- The paper
- Xu, S. S., Mak, M.-W., & Cheung, C.-C. (2019). Towards End-to-End ECG Classification With Raw Signal Extraction and Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2018.2871510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.