Cited by 81Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMachine Learning and AlgorithmsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Human Activity Recognition Based on Dynamic Active Learning

Bi, Haixia, Perello-Nieto, Miquel, Santos-Rodriguez, Raul, Flach, Peter·2021·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Activity of daily living is an important indicator of the health status and functional capabilities of an individual. Activity recognition, which aims at understanding the behavioral patterns of people, has increasingly received attention in recent years. However, there are still a number of challenges confronting the task. First, labelling training data is expensive and time-consuming, leading to limited availability of annotations. Secondly, activities performed by individuals have considerable variability, which renders the generally used supervised learning with a fixed label set unsuitable. To address these issues, we propose a dynamic active learning-based activity recognition method in this work. Different from traditional active learning methods which select samples based on a fixed label set, the proposed method not only selects informative samples from known classes, but also dynamically identifies new activities which are not included in the predefined label set. Starting with a classifier that has access to a limited number of labelled samples, we iteratively extend the training set with informative labels by fully considering the uncertainty, diversity and representativeness of samples, based on which better-informed classifiers can be trained, further reducing the annotation cost. We evaluate the proposed method on two synthetic datasets and two existing benchmark datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our method not only boosts the activity recognition performance with considerably reduced annotation cost, but also enables adaptive daily activity analysis allowing the presence and detection of novel activities and patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2020.3013403

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sliding window technique segments input sensor data into equal-size slices and classifies each slice as a certain class.

    “The sliding window technique is commonly used. It segments the input sensors data into slices with equal size [8][10]. Each slice with multiple samples is then classified as a certain class (window-wise classification).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bi, H., Perello-Nieto, M., Santos-Rodriguez, R., & Flach, P.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2021-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
922-934
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W3046349935
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • SPHERE Next Steps Project
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R005273/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
human activity recognition, activities of daily living, annotation cost reduction, sample diversity, sample representativeness
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Human Activities, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review