Human Activity Recognition Based on Dynamic Active Learning
Abstract
Activity of daily living is an important indicator of the health status and functional capabilities of an individual. Activity recognition, which aims at understanding the behavioral patterns of people, has increasingly received attention in recent years. However, there are still a number of challenges confronting the task. First, labelling training data is expensive and time-consuming, leading to limited availability of annotations. Secondly, activities performed by individuals have considerable variability, which renders the generally used supervised learning with a fixed label set unsuitable. To address these issues, we propose a dynamic active learning-based activity recognition method in this work. Different from traditional active learning methods which select samples based on a fixed label set, the proposed method not only selects informative samples from known classes, but also dynamically identifies new activities which are not included in the predefined label set. Starting with a classifier that has access to a limited number of labelled samples, we iteratively extend the training set with informative labels by fully considering the uncertainty, diversity and representativeness of samples, based on which better-informed classifiers can be trained, further reducing the annotation cost. We evaluate the proposed method on two synthetic datasets and two existing benchmark datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our method not only boosts the activity recognition performance with considerably reduced annotation cost, but also enables adaptive daily activity analysis allowing the presence and detection of novel activities and patterns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sliding window technique segments input sensor data into equal-size slices and classifies each slice as a certain class.
“The sliding window technique is commonly used. It segments the input sensors data into slices with equal size [8][10]. Each slice with multiple samples is then classified as a certain class (window-wise classification).”
From DS-MS-TCN: Otago Exercises Recognition With a Dual-Scale Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers
Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918 · Cited by 2,912 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A range of machine learning methods, including decision tree [7], [13], [14], support vector machine (SVM) [8], [15], [16], naive Bayes [10], [17], hidden Markov model (HMM) [18], and deep learning-based methods as convolutional neural networks (CNN) [11], [19]–[21] and long short-term memory…”
MethodUSC-HAD: a daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors
Zhang, M., & Sawchuk, A. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370438 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
A Deep Learning Approach to Human Activity Recognition Based on Single Accelerometer
Chen, Y., & Xue, Y. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2015.263 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Study of Activity Recognition Using Accelerometers
Twomey, N., Diethe, T., Fafoutis, X., Elsts, A., McConville, R., Flach, P., & Craddock, I. (2018) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics5020027 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human activity recognition using wearable sensors by heterogeneous convolutional neural networks
Han, C., Zhang, L., Tang, Y., Huang, W., Min, F., & He, J. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116764 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
DS-MS-TCN: Otago Exercises Recognition With a Dual-Scale Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network
Shang, M., Dedeyne, L., Dupont, J., Vercauteren, L., Amini, N., Lapauw, L., Gielen, E., Verschueren, S., Varon, C., De Raedt, W., et al. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3455426 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“It segments the input sensors data into windows with equal size [10]–[12].”
Background
- Authors
- Bi, H., Perello-Nieto, M., Santos-Rodriguez, R., & Flach, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 922-934
- ISSN
- 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2208
- OpenAlex
- W3046349935
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- SPHERE Next Steps Project
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R005273/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, activities of daily living, annotation cost reduction, sample diversity, sample representativeness
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Human Activities, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review