Cited by 130Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

Human activity recognition using wearable sensors by heterogeneous convolutional neural networks

Han, Chaolei, Zhang, Lei, Tang, Yin, Huang, Wenbo, Min, Fuhong, He, Jun·2022·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116764

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Han, C., Zhang, L., Tang, Y., Huang, W., Min, F., & He, J.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Lei
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
198
Pages
116764
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220659807
Cited by
130
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 6
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Major Basic Research Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, group convolution, convolutional neural networks, receptive fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review