Cited by 4Machine Learning in HealthcareMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Clinical Features and Physiological Signals Fusion Network for Mechanical Circulatory Support Need Prediction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Open access
Mendoza, Antonio, Tume, Sebastian, Puri, Kriti, Acosta, Sebastian, Cavallaro, Joseph R.·2025·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

We link the hemodynamic response to inotropic agents with outcomes related to Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) by analyzing physiological time series and clinical features using a Machine Learning/Deep Learning ensemble approach for multi-modal waveforms in the pediatric cardiac intensive care setting of a quaternary-care hospital. Unlike existing studies that typically process a single feature type or focus on short-term diagnoses from physiological signals, our novel system processes minute-by-minute multi-sensor data to identify the need for MCS in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. The data used includes tabular clinical features, time series from hemodynamic monitors, and raw waveforms from electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure signals. Our predictions support an early identification of high-risk patients after just two days of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, with classification and feature importance results confirming the predictive ability of the early hemodynamic response to inotropic agent administration, achieving an AUC of 0.88 in the prediction classification task. This is particularly significant in cases where clinical decisions are not straightforward, such as those in the cohort for this study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3510217

Cites

22 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendoza, A., Tume, S., Puri, K., Acosta, S., & Cavallaro, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2025-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
783-791
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4404914602
Cited by
4
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • DOD (HT9425-23-1-0663)
  • NIH (1R01HL166724-01A1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
mechanical circulatory support, pediatric cardiac intensive care, acute decompensated heart failure, inotropic agents, hemodynamic response, electrocardiogram, arterial blood pressure, early risk detection, ensemble learning, feature importance
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Failure, Heart-Assist Devices, Hemodynamics, Humans, Infant, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review