The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IoT Middleware: A Survey on Issues and Enabling technologies
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) provides the ability for humans and computers to learn and interact from billions of things that include sensors, actuators, services, and other Internet-connected objects. The realization of IoT systems will enable seamless integration of the cyber world with our physical world and will fundamentally change and empower human interaction with the world. A key technology in the realization of IoT systems is middleware, which is usually described as a software system designed to be the intermediary between IoT devices and applications. In this paper, we first motivate the need for an IoT middleware via an IoT application designed for real-time prediction of blood alcohol content using smartwatch sensor data. This is then followed by a survey on the capabilities of the existing IoT middleware. We further conduct a thorough analysis of the challenges and the enabling technologies in developing an IoT middleware that embraces the heterogeneity of IoT devices and also supports the essential ingredients of composition, adaptability, and security aspects of an IoT system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results
Dwork, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_1 · Cited by 3,542
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7252 · Cited by 2,605 · cited 3×
“Though 6LoWPAN [89] and CoAP [90] progress toward reducing the gap by compressing IPV6 packets, there still remains the subtle difference.”
BackgroundPrivacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704 · cited 1×
“We refer readers to [58]–[60] for further information.”
BackgroundEnabling the Internet of Things
Want, R., Schilit, B. N., & Jenson, S. (2015) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2015.12 · Cited by 444
Key agreement, the Algebraic Eraser^{𝑇𝑀}, and lightweight cryptography
Anshel, I., Anshel, M., Goldfeld, D., & Lemieux, S. (2006) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.1090/conm/418/07943 · Cited by 17
Cited by
Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues
Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · Cited by 825
A Comprehensive Review on Solar Powered Electric Vehicle Charging System
Khan, S., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, F., Shafaati Shemami, M., Saad Alam, M., & Khateeb, S. (2018) · Smart Science · doi:10.1080/23080477.2017.1419054 · Cited by 284
Fog/Edge Computing-Based IoT (FECIoT): Architecture, Applications, and Research Issues
Omoniwa, B., Hussain, R., Javed, M. A., Bouk, S. H., & Malik, S. A. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2875544 · Cited by 284
A Reference Model for Internet of Things Middleware
da Cruz, M. A. A., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Al-Muhtadi, J., Korotaev, V. V., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2796561 · Cited by 281
An Overview of Patient’s Health Status Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things (IoT)
Kadhim, K. T., Alsahlany, A. M., Wadi, S. M., & Kadhum, H. T. (2020) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-020-07474-0 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Ngu, A. H. H., Gutierrez, M., Metsis, V., Nepal, S., & Sheng, M. Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2529113503
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 76.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IoT Middleware: A Survey on Issues and Enabling technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2016.2615180
- The paper
- Ngu, A. H. H., Gutierrez, M., Metsis, V., Nepal, S., & Sheng, M. Z. (2016). IoT Middleware: A Survey on Issues and Enabling technologies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2016.2615180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
