Cited by 130Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Privacy in Internet of Things: From Principles to Technologies

Open access
Li, Chao, Palanisamy, Balaji·2019·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Ubiquitous deployment of low-cost smart devices and widespread use of high-speed wireless networks have led to the rapid development of the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT embraces countless physical objects that have not been involved in the traditional Internet and enables their interaction and cooperation to provide a wide range of IoT applications. Many services in the IoT may require a comprehensive understanding and analysis of data collected through a large number of physical devices that challenges both personal information privacy and the development of IoT. Information privacy in IoT is a broad and complex concept as its understanding and perception differ among individuals and its enforcement requires efforts from both legislation as well as technologies. In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art principles of privacy laws, the architectures for IoT and the representative privacy enhancing technologies (PETs). We analyze how legal principles can be supported through a careful implementation of PETs at various layers of a layered IoT architecture model to meet the privacy requirements of the individuals interacting with IoT systems. We demonstrate how privacy legislation maps to privacy principles which in turn drives the design of necessary PETs to be employed in the IoT architecture stack.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2018.2864168

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 175 references

5 of the 175 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 2018, Google Goggle Fit
  2. 2018, OpenHAB
  3. 2018, Alljoyn
  4. 0, Final Report - RFID and the Inclusive Model for the Internet of Things
  5. 2013, OneM2M Requirements Technical Specification
  6. minerva, 2015, Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT), The Internet-II initiative, 1
  7. 2018, Privacy Shield
  8. 2018, GDPR Key Changes
  9. 2018, Principles of Privacy in the University
  10. 2018, Privacy Policy Guidance Memorandum
  11. 2018, Guidelines on the Protection of Personal Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data
  12. 2018, SAFE HARBOR
  13. 2016, Bluetooth core specification v5 0
  14. 2018, Wi-Fi HaLow
  15. cranor, 2002, A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1 0 (APPEL1 0)
  16. 2017, Tor Network Status
  17. 2016, Industrial Internet of Things Volume G4 Security Framework
  18. 2014, DDSI-RTPS
  19. 2015, Visual tool for wiring internet of things nodered
  20. 2015, IMT Vision–Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond
  21. 2018, Xively
  22. 2017, 8 4 Billion Connected ’Things’ Will be in use in 2017 up 31 Percent From 2016
  23. 2006, ZigBee specification
  24. 2018, Blackmirror
  25. 2013, IEEE Internet of Things Survey Provides Clarity Around Definition Future Uses and Challenges
  26. leander, 2007, New lightweight DES variants suited for RFID applications, Proc FSE, 4593, 196
  27. 2018, Threads
  28. 2018, IPSO Alliance
  29. gauravaram, 2009, Grøstl-a SHA-3 candidate, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 1
  30. 2008, Rs08ka
  31. 10.2307/1321160 · DOI
  32. 1973, Records Computer and the Rights of Citizens Report of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems
  33. biryukov, 2015, Lightweight Cryptography Lounge
  34. xu, 2013, A personalized k-anonymity privacy preserving method, J Inf Comput Sci, 10, 139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., & Palanisamy, B.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2019-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
488-505
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2885623796
Cited by
130
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Things, privacy, privacy-enhancing technologies, privacy law, privacy principles, IoT architecture, data privacy, data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review