Cited by 22IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingEnergy Efficiency in ComputingAge of Information Optimization

Distributed Online Learning of Fog Computing Under Nonuniform Device Cardinality

Ren, Chenshan, Lyu, Xinchen, Ni, Wei, Tian, Hui, Liu, Ren Ping·2019·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Processing data around the point of capture, fog computing can support computationally demanding Internet-of-Things (IoT) services. Distributed online optimization is important given the size of IoT, but challenging due to time variations of random traffic and nonuniform connectivity (or cardinality) of edge servers and IoT devices. This paper presents a distributed online learning approach to asymptotically minimizing the time-average cost of fog computing in the absence of the a-priori knowledge on traffic randomness, for light-weight, and delay-tolerant application scenarios. Stochastic gradient descent is exploited to decouple the optimizations between time slots. A graph matching problem is then formulated for every time slot by decoupling and unifying the nonuniform cardinalities, and solved in a distributed manner by developing a new linear (1/2)-approximation method. We prove that the optimality loss resulting from the distributed approximate graph matching method can be compensated and diminish by increasing the learning time. Corroborated by simulations, the proposed distributed online learning is asymptotically optimal and superior to the state of the art in terms of throughput and energy efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2018.2867481

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, C., Lyu, X., Ni, W., Tian, H., & Liu, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2019-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1147-1159
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2889306979
Cited by
22
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61790553, 61421061)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017ZX03001003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
Keywords
fog computing, distributed online learning, Internet of Things, stochastic gradient descent, graph matching, linearization, edge servers, energy efficiency, throughput

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review