Cited by 227Air Quality Monitoring and ForecastingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataUAV Applications and Optimization

Federated Learning in the Sky: Aerial-Ground Air Quality Sensing Framework With UAV Swarms

Open access
Liu, Yi, Nie, Jiangtian, Li, Xuandi, Ahmed, Syed Hassan, Lim, Wei Yang Bryan, Miao, Chunyan·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Due to air quality significantly affects human health, it is becoming increasingly important to accurately and timely predict the air quality index (AQI). To this end, this article proposes a new federated learning (FL)-based aerial-ground air quality sensing framework for fine-grained 3-D air quality monitoring and forecasting. Specifically, in the air, this framework leverages a lightweight Dense-MobileNet model to achieve energy-efficient end-to-end learning from haze features of haze images taken by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for predicting AQI scale distribution. Furthermore, the FL framework not only allows various organizations or institutions to collaboratively learn a well-trained global model to monitor AQI without compromising privacy but also expands the scope of UAV swarms monitoring. For ground sensing systems, we propose a graph convolutional neural network-based long short-term memory (GC-LSTM) model to achieve accurate, real time, and future AQI inference. The GC-LSTM model utilizes the topological structure of the ground monitoring station to capture the spatiotemporal correlation of historical observation data, which helps the aerial-ground sensing system to achieve accurate AQI inference. Through extensive case studies on a real-world data set, numerical results show that the proposed framework can achieve accurate and energy-efficient AQI sensing without compromising the privacy of raw data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.3021006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed federated learning scheme achieves better accuracy in air quality estimation compared to CNN and SVM-based algorithms.

    “Compared to CNN and SVM-based algorithms, the proposed federated learning scheme can achieve a better accuracy in air quality estimation with privacy protection and energy efficiency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Nie, J., Li, X., Ahmed, S. H., Lim, W. Y. B., & Miao, C.
Affiliations
  • Heilongjiang University (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-06-15
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
9827-9837
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3044274646
Cited by
227
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 5
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Young Innovation Talents Project in Higher Education of Guangdong Province, China (2018KQNCX333)
  • Joint NTU-WeBank Research Centre on FinTech NTU, Singapore (NWJ-2020-004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
Keywords
federated learning, air quality index prediction, UAV swarms, spatio-temporal correlation, energy-efficient learning, privacy preservation, cooperative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review