Federated Learning in the Sky: Aerial-Ground Air Quality Sensing Framework With UAV Swarms
Open accessAbstract
Due to air quality significantly affects human health, it is becoming increasingly important to accurately and timely predict the air quality index (AQI). To this end, this article proposes a new federated learning (FL)-based aerial-ground air quality sensing framework for fine-grained 3-D air quality monitoring and forecasting. Specifically, in the air, this framework leverages a lightweight Dense-MobileNet model to achieve energy-efficient end-to-end learning from haze features of haze images taken by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for predicting AQI scale distribution. Furthermore, the FL framework not only allows various organizations or institutions to collaboratively learn a well-trained global model to monitor AQI without compromising privacy but also expands the scope of UAV swarms monitoring. For ground sensing systems, we propose a graph convolutional neural network-based long short-term memory (GC-LSTM) model to achieve accurate, real time, and future AQI inference. The GC-LSTM model utilizes the topological structure of the ground monitoring station to capture the spatiotemporal correlation of historical observation data, which helps the aerial-ground sensing system to achieve accurate AQI inference. Through extensive case studies on a real-world data set, numerical results show that the proposed framework can achieve accurate and energy-efficient AQI sensing without compromising the privacy of raw data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed federated learning scheme achieves better accuracy in air quality estimation compared to CNN and SVM-based algorithms.
“Compared to CNN and SVM-based algorithms, the proposed federated learning scheme can achieve a better accuracy in air quality estimation with privacy protection and energy efficiency.”
From Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [147]
Cites
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7 · Cited by 3,001 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Traffic Flow Prediction: A Federated Learning Approach
Liu, Y., Yu, J. J. Q., Kang, J., Niyato, D., & Zhang, S. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2991401 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Self-citationFederated learning for 6G communications: Challenges, methods, and future directions
Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Xiong, Z., Kang, J., Wang, X., & Niyato, D. (2020) · China Communications · doi:10.23919/jcc.2020.09.009 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Vincent Poor, H. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3075439 · Cited by 1,503 · see citing works
“[147] UAV energy management HFL UAVs Central server A federated UAV scheme for aerial air quality sensing.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Survey on Federated Learning for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices
Imteaj, A., Thakker, U., Wang, S., Li, J., & Amini, M. H. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3095077 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
Drones’ Edge Intelligence Over Smart Environments in B5G: Blockchain and Federated Learning Synergy
Alsamhi, S. H., Almalki, F. A., Afghah, F., Hawbani, A., Shvetsov, A. V., Lee, B., & Song, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2021.3132561 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Lead federated neuromorphic learning for wireless edge artificial intelligence
Yang, H., Lam, K.-Y., Xiao, L., Xiong, Z., Hu, H., Niyato, D., & Vincent Poor, H. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32020-w · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Nie, J., Li, X., Ahmed, S. H., Lim, W. Y. B., & Miao, C.
- Affiliations
- Heilongjiang University (CN)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Georgia Southern University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2021-06-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9827-9837
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3044274646
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Young Innovation Talents Project in Higher Education of Guangdong Province, China (2018KQNCX333)
- Joint NTU-WeBank Research Centre on FinTech NTU, Singapore (NWJ-2020-004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
- Keywords
- federated learning, air quality index prediction, UAV swarms, spatio-temporal correlation, energy-efficient learning, privacy preservation, cooperative learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review