The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Federated-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection for IoT Security Attacks
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is made up of billions of physical devices connected to the Internet via networks that perform tasks independently with less human intervention. Such brilliant automation of mundane tasks requires a considerable amount of user data in digital format, which, in turn, makes IoT networks an open source of personally identifiable information data for malicious attackers to steal, manipulate, and perform nefarious activities. A huge interest has been developed over the past years in applying machine learning (ML)-assisted approaches in the IoT security space. However, the assumption in many current works is that big training data are widely available and transferable to the main server because data are born at the edge and are generated continuously by IoT devices. This is to say that classic ML works on the legacy set of entire data located on a central server, which makes it the least preferred option for domains with privacy concerns on user data. To address this issue, we propose the federated-learning (FL)-based anomaly detection approach to proactively recognize intrusion in IoT networks using decentralized on-device data. Our approach uses federated training rounds on gated recurrent units (GRUs) models and keeps the data intact on local IoT devices by sharing only the learned weights with the central server of FL. Also, the approach’s ensembler part aggregates the updates from multiple sources to optimize the global ML model’s accuracy. Our experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms the classic/centralized machine learning (non-FL) versions in securing the privacy of user data and provides an optimal accuracy rate in attack detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Long short-term memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic modeling
Sak, H., Senior, A., & Beaufays, F. (2014) · Interspeech 2014 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2014-80 · Cited by 2,973
DDoS in the IoT: Mirai and Other Botnets
Kolias, C., Kambourakis, G., Stavrou, A., & Voas, J. (2017) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2017.201 · Cited by 1,892
The Handbook of brain theory and neural networks
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-0300 · Cited by 1,524
A survey on security and privacy of federated learning
Mothukuri, V., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Huang, Y., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007 · Cited by 1,480
Self-citationCharacterization of Encrypted and VPN Traffic using Time-related Features
Draper-Gil, G., Lashkari, A. H., Mamun, M. S. I., & A. Ghorbani, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0005740700001242 · Cited by 1,213
An IoT-Aware Architecture for Smart Healthcare Systems
Catarinucci, L., de Donno, D., Mainetti, L., Palano, L., Patrono, L., Stefanizzi, M. L., & Tarricone, L. (2015) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2015.2417684 · Cited by 1,167
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Panigrahi, 2018, A detailed analysis of CICIDS2017 dataset for designing intrusion detection systems, Int. J. Eng. Technol., 7, 479
- Malhotra, Long short term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series, 89, 89
- 10.5220/0005740704070414 · doi:10.5220/0005740704070414 · Paper page
- Dietterichl, 2002, Ensemble learning, 405
- 10.1023/A:I0I0933404324 · doi:10.1023/a:i0i0933404324
- 10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729209 · doi:10.1109/itnec.2019.8729209
- Bhatia, Practical modbus flooding attack and detection, 57
Cited by
Federated Learning for intrusion detection system: Concepts, challenges and future directions
Agrawal, S., Sarkar, S., Aouedi, O., Yenduri, G., Piamrat, K., Alazab, M., Bhattacharya, S., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2022.09.012 · Cited by 457
Ferrag, M. A., Friha, O., Maglaras, L., Janicke, H., & Shu, L. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3118642 · Cited by 342
IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey
Chatterjee, A., & Ahmed, B. S. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568 · Cited by 323
Ramu, S. P., Boopalan, P., Pham, Q.-V., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Huynh-The, T., Alazab, M., Nguyen, T. T., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103663 · Cited by 301
Federated Intrusion Detection in Blockchain-Based Smart Transportation Systems
Abdel-Basset, M., Moustafa, N., Hawash, H., Razzak, I., Sallam, K. M., & Elkomy, O. M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3119968 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Mothukuri, V., Khare, P., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-02-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2545-2554
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3157680283
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 51.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Federated-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection for IoT Security Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2021.3077803
- The paper
- Mothukuri, V., Khare, P., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2022). Federated-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection for IoT Security Attacks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2021.3077803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
