A Robust Approach for Privacy Data Protection: IoT Security Assurance Using Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning
Abstract
With the increasing importance of data security, privacy protection has gradually risen to a strategic position, especially IoT data privacy protection. The concern for data security has become a national strategy. The discovery of potential risks of privacy data is of great significance, such as the risk of data privacy leakage, data security vulnerabilities, etc. In this article, starting from the privacy data protection mechanism in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) scenario, we proposed a method based on generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) to discover the privacy data security risks in IIoT by training privacy protection agents using a large amount of expert data on privacy protection. Finally, our proposed method is validated by relevant simulation experiments, and the results show that our proposed method has wide generalizability and reliability to obtain the maximum payoff of the agents and thus, reduce the risk of data security leakage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general architecture of the IoT system has four parts: the perception layer, the transmission layer, the processing layer, and the application layer.
“The general architecture of the IoT system has four parts: the perception layer, the transmission layer, the processing layer, and the application layer [14].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Generative adversarial imitation learning
Ho, J., & Ermon, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03476 · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, C., Bult, P., van Ginneken, B., & van der Laak, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26286 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Uniting cyber security and machine learning: Advantages, challenges and future research
Wazid, M., Das, A. K., Chamola, V., & Park, Y. (2022) · ICT Express · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2022.04.007 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Generative AI Solutions in IoT Security
López Delgado, J. L., & López Ramos, J. A. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13244965 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, C., Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C.
- Affiliations
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Tongji University (CN)
- Anhui Normal University (CN)
- Fecomeércio - IPDC & Senac Faculty of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
- Department of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-09-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 17089-17097
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3213524376
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FCT/MCTES through national funds and co-funded EU funds (UIDB/50008/2020)
- Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development–CNPq (313036/2020-9)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61902003)
- Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Anhui Normal University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- privacy data protection, Industrial Internet of Things, generative adversarial imitation learning, privacy leakage, security assurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review