Cited by 36Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

A Robust Approach for Privacy Data Protection: IoT Security Assurance Using Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning

Huang, Chenxi, Chen, Sirui, Zhang, Yaqing, Zhou, Wen, Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C., de Albuquerque, Victor Hugo C.·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

With the increasing importance of data security, privacy protection has gradually risen to a strategic position, especially IoT data privacy protection. The concern for data security has become a national strategy. The discovery of potential risks of privacy data is of great significance, such as the risk of data privacy leakage, data security vulnerabilities, etc. In this article, starting from the privacy data protection mechanism in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) scenario, we proposed a method based on generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) to discover the privacy data security risks in IIoT by training privacy protection agents using a large amount of expert data on privacy protection. Finally, our proposed method is validated by relevant simulation experiments, and the results show that our proposed method has wide generalizability and reliability to obtain the maximum payoff of the agents and thus, reduce the risk of data security leakage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3128531

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The general architecture of the IoT system has four parts: the perception layer, the transmission layer, the processing layer, and the application layer.

    “The general architecture of the IoT system has four parts: the perception layer, the transmission layer, the processing layer, and the application layer [14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C., Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • Fecomeércio - IPDC & Senac Faculty of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
  • Department of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-09-15
Volume
9
Issue
18
Pages
17089-17097
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3213524376
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FCT/MCTES through national funds and co-funded EU funds (UIDB/50008/2020)
  • Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development–CNPq (313036/2020-9)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61902003)
  • Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Anhui Normal University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
privacy data protection, Industrial Internet of Things, generative adversarial imitation learning, privacy leakage, security assurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review