Cited by 1,069AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis

Open access
Litjens, Geert, Sánchez, Clara I., Timofeeva, Nadya, Hermsen, Meyke, Nagtegaal, Iris, Kovacs, Iringo, Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, Christina, Bult, Peter +2 more·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Pathologists face a substantial increase in workload and complexity of histopathologic cancer diagnosis due to the advent of personalized medicine. Therefore, diagnostic protocols have to focus equally on efficiency and accuracy. In this paper we introduce ‘deep learning’ as a technique to improve the objectivity and efficiency of histopathologic slide analysis. Through two examples, prostate cancer identification in biopsy specimens and breast cancer metastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes, we show the potential of this new methodology to reduce the workload for pathologists, while at the same time increasing objectivity of diagnoses. We found that all slides containing prostate cancer and micro- and macro-metastases of breast cancer could be identified automatically while 30–40% of the slides containing benign and normal tissue could be excluded without the use of any additional immunohistochemical markers or human intervention. We conclude that ‘deep learning’ holds great promise to improve the efficacy of prostate cancer diagnosis and breast cancer staging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep26286

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, C., Bult, P., van Ginneken, B., & van der Laak, J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
Corresponding author
Litjens, Geert
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
26286-26286
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2401520370
Cited by
1,069
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
81.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
deep learning, histopathological diagnosis, prostate cancer detection, breast cancer metastasis, sentinel lymph node, tumor staging
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Histological Techniques, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Prostatic Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review