The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustered Federated Learning With Adaptive Local Differential Privacy on Heterogeneous IoT Data
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is penetrating many aspects of our daily life with the proliferation of artificial intelligence applications. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm enabling many intelligent IoT applications; however, the transmitted model gradients or weights still encode private information, which can be exploited to launch inference attacks. One popular way is to apply local differential privacy (LDP) into FL. However, existing work does not provide a practical solution due to two issues. First, the fine-grained range difference of weights in different layers of an FL model has not been explicitly considered. Second, the accumulated privacy budget may cause a budget explosion. In this article, we propose a local differentially private scheme to train clustered FL models on heterogeneous IoT data by using adaptive clipping, weight compression, and parameter shuffling (namely, ACS-FL), aimed at mitigating the curse of dimensionality, the amount of LDP noise, and the communication overhead of IoT devices. Empirical evaluations on MNIST, fashion-MNIST, and Federated Extended MNIST demonstrate that ACS-FL achieves a superior performance in balancing the tradeoff between privacy and utility.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Through adding noise to updates, differential privacy confirms that personal data cannot be derived from the final aggregated model, an important feature for handling sensitive health data in FL applications [87].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [87]
In the citing paper
“Distinctive privacy is broadly adopted in FL to protect private contributions to model updates.”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578
Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms
Xiao, H., Rasul, K., & Vollgraf, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.07747 · Cited by 6,108
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000042 · Cited by 5,557
Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.06127 · Cited by 4,023
Lin, J., Yu, W., Zhang, N., Yang, X., Zhang, H., & Zhao, W. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2683200 · Cited by 2,793
Federated Learning with Non-IID Data
Zhao, Y., Li, M., Lai, L., Suda, N., Civin, D., & Chandra, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.00582 · Cited by 2,077
SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.12 · Cited by 1,936
Zhu, L., & Han, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_2 · Cited by 1,906
Towards Personalized Federated Learning
Tan, A. Z., Yu, H., Cui, L., & Yang, Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3160699 · Cited by 1,474
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Xu, 2021, FedMood: Federated learning on mobile health data for mood detection, arXiv:2102.09342 · arXiv
- LeCun, 2010, MNIST Handwritten Digit Database
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–143 of 143
Tang, H., Shi, L., Zhu, Y., Gu, C., & Xu, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8725-1_27
Gu, C., Shi, L., Liu, B., Tang, H., & Xu, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8731-2_24
Yu, Q., Wu, J., Fan, X., Cui, X., Wang, T., Li, G., & Luo, C. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8731-2_23
Robust clustering federated learning with trusted anchor clients
Zhang, M., Li, Y., Wei, F., Wang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104210
Personalized Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Information Content Model Customization
Gao, Y., He, X., & Chen, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Intelligent Computing (CAMMIC) · doi:10.1145/3745533.3745668
“Second, the problem of data heterogeneity also seriously affects the performance of federated learning [ 9 ] .”
Medhi, J. K., Chen, X., Pan, M., & Li, P. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3616896
“Differential privacy (DP) has been widely adopted to protect against inference from gradients or updates [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42].”
Wu, X., Liu, T., Wang, X., Yang, M., & Yu, J. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3627149
“He et al. [15] used strategies such as adaptive clipping, weight compression, and parameter shu ffl ing to mitigate the impact of noise under the local DP mechanism.”
Li, M., Sun, L., Liu, Z., Zhu, R., & Song, H. H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3628328
“So far, CFL has been explored mainly in centralized network architectures [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].”
Shi, J., Niu, K., tan, W., Tian, Y., & Peng, C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5721768
FedSDA: Enhancing Federated Learning with Client-Specific Data Augmentation
Zuo, Z., Zhang, H., Dong, A., Han, Y., & Yu, J. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11227265
Secure and Trustworthy Federated Learning Framework via Hierarchical Sharding Blockchain
Wei, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Zhao, Z., & Li, Y. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3639396
“It reduces the noise introduced by DP [32] and decreases the computational overhead associated with vector operations.”
Malicious Node Detection in Social Networks Based on Power-Law Distribution
Huang, J., Hou, L., Gao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2025) · International Symposium on Computer and Information Processing Technology (ISCIPT) · doi:10.1109/iscipt67144.2025.11265293
“The sensitive exposure information may pose serious threats to user privacy [1].”
Entropy‐Driven Personalized Privacy and Dynamic Federated Learning in IoT Systems
Li, C., Li, J., Liu, M., & Wang, H. (2025) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.70180
Qiu, H. (2025) · International Conference on Cyber Security and Information Engineering (ICCSIE) · doi:10.1109/iccsie65832.2025.00070
“Under the horizontal FL framework, the relationship between local model updates on the client side and privacy protection strength can be expressed by Equation (1) [10].”
Federated learning with adaptively sparsified and recoverable perturbation for internet of things
Birhanu, H., & Takele, A. K. (2026) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-026-00294-x
A Federated CLIP Fine-Tuning Method Based on Optimal Transport and Dual Prompt Personalization
Shi, L., Li, Z., Ding, X., Zhu, Y., & Yao, X. S. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15050972
Sasirekha, B., & Gunavathi, C. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8425166/v1
IncentEn-Fed: An incentive-driven ensemble framework for heterogeneous federated learning
Peng, Y., Ma, X., Xiong, P., & Zhu, T. (2026) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2026.104435
Distributed Differential Privacy Protection with High Data Availability in Smart Grids
Li, Y., Huo, Y., Fan, X. H., Niu, C., Mao, J., & Jing, T. (2026) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2025.9010032
Díaz, J. S.-P., Athanasiou, A., Jung, K., Catuscia Palamidessi, A., & García, Á. L. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115993 · Cited by 3
Application of clustering search combined with federated learning in secure advertising delivery
Hu, Y., & Niu, Y. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae6234
“As a result, each user is assigned to a specific cluster, forming k user groups [17, 18].”
Xu, J., Mehmood, H., van Dalen, R., Saravanan, K., & Özay, M. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11461728
“To our knowledge, [20] and [21] are the only existing works that add DP to clustered FL.”
FL(DP)$$^2$$: Federated Learning with Dynamic Personalized Differential Privacy
Shi, C., Wang, J., Liu, L., Xin, C., & Pu, Y. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23447-6_22
Ma, M., Obaidat, M. S., Ma, J., Yu, Y., Sun, S., & Chang, X. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.3691206
“DP-based FL adds calibrated noise to client updates or gradients, providing statistical privacy guarantees at the cost of a utility–privacy trade-off [14], [15], [16].”
Fisher-driven privacy preservation against category inference attacks in federated learning
Shi, L., Gu, C., Fan, Y., Tang, H., & Zhu, Y. (2026) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2026.100399
Li, X., & Chu, S. (2026) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.70229
“This design makes it impossible to effectively control perturbation errors in the encryption and decryption process; the accumulated error eventually has a significant negative impact on the accuracy of ciphertext computing, thus restricting the practical value of the encryption scheme [9].”
PriMO: A Personalized Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Trajectory Data Privacy
Wang, Y., & Li, K. (2026) · International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering, Big Data and Computer Technology (EIBDCT) · doi:10.1109/eibdct69742.2026.11566915
“Approaches based on differential privacy (DP) or k -anonymity focus on the privacy–utility trade-off [5], [6], while lightweight mechanisms emphasize reducing system overhead or synthesis quality [7]–[9].”
Wang, H., Liang, X., Liu, P., & Liu, K. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116587
Design and Implementation of a Federated Integration Algorithm for Heterogeneous Data Sources
Zhang, F. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.05.231
Haripriya, R., Khare, N., Pandey, M., & Biswas, S. (2026) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-026-02692-7
“This is achieved by introducing controlled noise to the model parameters during the federated averaging process [75], ensuring that privacy is maintained without significantly compromising the accuracy and utility of the clustering results[76].”
Alkhorasani, H., Zolait, A. H., & Alawag, A. M. (2026) · International Conference on Frontiers of Engineering and Emerging Technologies (FET) · doi:10.1109/fet68771.2026.11601477
“He et al. [62] suggested ACS-FL to overcome the challenge of heterogeneity and privacy-utility tradeoffs, and [64] examined large-scale cross-silo FL through KubeEdge, but neither of the two has evaluated adversarial and regulatory factors.”
IntraShuffler: A Privacy Preserving Framework for Heterogeneous DP Federated Learning
Riya, F. F., Kotevska, O., & Sun, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-33260-8_3
“He et al. [33] introduce a form of parameter-level shuffling in FL, where each client locally shuffles model weights by attaching identifiers and locations before transmission.”
Federated learning based on personalized differential privacy and parameter selection
Dou, H., Du, N., Long, Y., Sang, H., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.133971
Muwahed, S., & Sawalha, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32726-0_22
Kaushik, A. K., Kandhoul, N., Dhurandher, S. K., & Sharma, D. K. (2026) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-026-06476-0
“To address these challenges in securing IIoT systems, ML has occurred as a powerful tool for improving privacy and security [8].”
EdurLDP-FL: Differential privacy for accelerated convergence in federated learning
Jia, H., Wang, Z., Yan, X., Tang, Y., & Li, Q. (2026) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2026.112715
A Federated Deep Learning Framework for Privacy-Preserving IoT-Based Healthcare Monitoring Systems
Sultana, F., Laskar, A. R., Barbhuiya, S. A. S. K., & Laskar, K. A. (2026) · International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology · doi:10.67317/ijmsrt26aug151
Differentially private federated learning for image analysis in smart-city surveillance
Pandya, N., & Mistry, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Imaging · doi:10.3389/fimag.2026.1966936
Secure Federated Learning Based on the OPTICS Clustering Algorithm and Client Selection
Ma, C., Zhang, Z., Huang, B., Luo, C., Li, G., & Wu, J. (2026) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2026.9010011
Feng, L., Zhou, J., Fang, F., Yu, Y., & Wang, J. (2026) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2026.112773
Li, G., & Chen, P. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17090927
Mitigating Gradient Leakage in Asynchronous Federated Learning via Orthogonal Obfuscation
Yazdani, S., Guzinski, N., Torres, G., Panwar, G., Tourani, R., & Misra, S. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security · doi:10.1109/cns69863.2026.11720890
“Subsequent variations have integrated participant-level DP into personalized [9] and clustered [10] FL settings to attempt to balance model convergence with privacy guarantees.”
Shi, Y., Li, X., Zhu, W., Liu, S., & Cheng, H. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Networks · doi:10.1016/j.ijin.2026.10.005
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Z., Wang, L., & Cai, Z.
- Affiliations
- Jinan University (CN)
- Georgia State University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2024-01-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-146
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W4385627109
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 48
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Project (SL2022A04J01519)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- federated learning, local differential privacy, Internet of Things, data heterogeneity, clustering, adaptive clipping, weight compression, privacy-utility trade-off, inference attacks, communication overhead
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review