The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength
Abstract
An issue in microfabrication of the fluidic channels in glass/poly (dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) is the absence of a well-defined study of the bonding strength between the surfaces making up these channels. Although most of the research papers mention the use of oxygen plasma for developing chemical (siloxane) bonds between the participating surfaces, yet they only define a certain set of parameters, tailored to a specific setup. An important requirement of all the microfluidics/biosensors industry is the development of a general regime, which defines a systematic method of gauging the bond strength between the participating surfaces in advance by correlation to a common parameter. This enhances the reliability of the devices and also gives a structured approach to its future large-scale manufacturing. In this paper, we explore the possibility of the existence of a common scale, which can be used to gauge bond strength between various surfaces. We find that the changes in wettability of surfaces owing to various levels of plasma exposure can be a useful parameter to gauge the bond strength. We obtained a good correlation between contact angle of deionized water (a direct measure of wettability) on the PDMS and glass surfaces based on various dosages or oxygen plasma treatment. The exposure was done first in an inductively coupled high-density (ICP) plasma system and then in plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) system. This was followed by the measurement of bond strength by use or the standardized blister test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bodas, D., & Khan-Malek, C. (2007) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2006.08.037 · Cited by 600
Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices
Eddings, M. A., Johnson, M. A., & Gale, B. K. (2008) · Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/18/6/067001 · Cited by 567
Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel
Tan, S. H., Nguyen, N.-T., Chua, Y. C., & Kang, T. G. (2010) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.3466882 · Cited by 440
A Wireless-Implantable Microsystem for Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring
Ahmadi, M. M., & Jullien, G. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2009.2016844 · Cited by 266
Micropatterns of Matrigel for three-dimensional epithelial cultures
Sodunke, T. R., Turner, K. K., Caldwell, S. A., McBride, K. W., Reginato, M. J., & Noh, H. “. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.021 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhattacharya, S., Datta, A., Berg, J. M., & Gangopadhyay, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 590-597
- ISSN
- 1057-7157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151279342
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jmems.2005.844746
- The paper
- Bhattacharya, S., Datta, A., Berg, J. M., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2005). Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/jmems.2005.844746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.