The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking
Abstract
Modern surveillance systems often utilize multiple physically distributed sensors of different types to provide complementary and overlapping coverage on targets. In order to generate target tracks and estimates, the sensor data need to be fused. While a centralized processing approach is theoretically optimal, there are significant advantages in distributing the fusion operations over multiple processing nodes. This paper discusses architectures for distributed fusion, whereby each node processes the data from its own set of sensors and communicates with other nodes to improve on the estimates, The information graph is introduced as a way of modeling information flow in distributed fusion systems and for developing algorithms. Fusion for target tracking involves two main operations: estimation and association. Distributed estimation algorithms based on the information graph are presented for arbitrary fusion architectures and related to linear and nonlinear distributed estimation results. The distributed data association problem is discussed in terms of track-to-track association likelihoods. Distributed versions of two popular tracking approaches (joint probabilistic data association and multiple hypothesis tracking) are then presented, and examples of applications are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, B. D. O., Moore, J. B., & Eslami, M. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · Cited by 3,195
Bar‐Shalom, Y. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,157
Bar-Shalom, Y., Fortmann, T. E., & Cable, P. G. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.398863 · Cited by 3,070
An algorithm for tracking multiple targets
Reid, D. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102177 · Cited by 3,059
Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques
Bar-Shalom, Y., & Rong-Li, X. (1995) · Cited by 2,155
Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion
Hall, D. L. (1992) · Cited by 1,356
Multiple-Target Tracking with Radar Applications
Blackman, S. S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,217
Optimal Data Fusion in Multiple Sensor Detection Systems
Chair, Z., & Varshney, P. K. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.1986.310699 · Cited by 1,130
Detection with Distributed Sensors
Tenney, R., & Sandell, N. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.1981.309178 · Cited by 846
(2007) · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71559-7 · Cited by 780
Cited by
A Review of Data Fusion Techniques
Castanedo, F. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/704504 · Cited by 1,027
Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion at the Edge
Munir, A., Blasch, E., Kwon, J., Kong, J., & Aved, A. (2021) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2020.3043072 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Liggins, M. E., Chong, C.-Y., Kadar, I., Alford, M. G., Vannicola, V., & Thomopoulos, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-107
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114864438
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.1997.554211
- The paper
- Liggins, M. E., Chong, C.-Y., Kadar, I., Alford, M. G., Vannicola, V., & Thomopoulos, S. (1997). Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.1997.554211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.