The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compressed Channel Sensing: A New Approach to Estimating Sparse Multipath Channels
Abstract
High-rate data communication over a multipath wireless channel often requires that the channel response be known at the receiver. Training-based methods, which probe the channel in time, frequency, and space with known signals and reconstruct the channel response from the output signals, are most commonly used to accomplish this task. Traditional training-based channel estimation methods, typically comprising linear reconstruction techniques, are known to be optimal for rich multipath channels. However, physical arguments and growing experimental evidence suggest that many wireless channels encountered in practice tend to exhibit a sparse multipath structure that gets pronounced as the signal space dimension gets large (e.g., due to large bandwidth or large number of antennas). In this paper, we formalize the notion of multipath sparsity and present a new approach to estimating sparse (or effectively sparse) multipath channels that is based on some of the recent advances in the theory of compressed sensing. In particular, it is shown in the paper that the proposed approach, which is termed as compressed channel sensing (CCS), can potentially achieve a target reconstruction error using far less energy and, in many instances, latency and bandwidth than that dictated by the traditional least-squares-based training methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Fundamentals of Wireless Communication
Tse, D., & Viswanath, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807213 · Cited by 13,162
Cited by
Dictionary Learning-Based Sparse Channel Representation and Estimation for FDD Massive MIMO Systems
Ding, Y., & Rao, B. D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2843786 · Cited by 161
Beam Alignment in mmWave V2X Communications: A Survey
Tan, J., Luan, T. H., Guan, W., Wang, Y., Peng, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, D., & Lu, N. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3383093 · Cited by 75
Predicting Wireless Channel Features Using Neural Networks
Navabi, S., Wang, C., Bursalioglu, O. Y., & Papadopoulos, H. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8422221 · Cited by 51
Blind Demixing for Low-Latency Communication
Dong, J., Yang, K., & Shi, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2886191 · Cited by 22
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bajwa, W. U., Haupt, J., Sayeed, A. M., & Nowak, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1058-1076
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2137628444
- Cited by
- 1,152
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.