The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Options for Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators
Open accessAbstract
High-penetration levels of distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation on an electrical distribution circuit present several challenges and opportunities for distribution utilities. Rapidly varying irradiance conditions may cause voltage sags and swells that cannot be compensated by slowly responding utility equipment resulting in a degradation of power quality. Although not permitted under current standards for interconnection of distributed generation, fast-reacting, VAR-capable PV inverters may provide the necessary reactive power injection or consumption to maintain voltage regulation under difficult transient conditions. As side benefit, the control of reactive power injection at each PV inverter provides an opportunity and a new tool for distribution utilities to optimize the performance of distribution circuits, e.g., by minimizing thermal losses. We discuss and compare via simulation various design options for control systems to manage the reactive power generated by these inverters. An important design decision that weighs on the speed and quality of communication required is whether the control should be centralized or distributed (i.e., local). In general, we find that local control schemes are able to maintain voltage within acceptable bounds. We consider the benefits of choosing different local variables on which to control and how the control system can be continuously tuned between robust voltage control, suitable for daytime operation when circuit conditions can change rapidly, and loss minimization better suited for nighttime operation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Local Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators
Turitsyn, K., Sulc, P., Backhaus, S., & Chertkov, M. (2010) · 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications · doi:10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622021 · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Cited by
Liu, C., Chau, K. T., Wu, D., & Gao, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2013.2271951 · Cited by 917
Antoniadou-Plytaria, K. E., Kouveliotis-Lysikatos, I. N., Georgilakis, P. S., & Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2679238 · Cited by 545
Anurag, A., Yang, Y., & Blaabjerg, F. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2015.2428432 · Cited by 153
Review on the PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Networks
Fatima, S., Püvi, V., & Lehtonen, M. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13184756 · Cited by 137
Toward Distributed Energy Services: Decentralizing Optimal Power Flow With Machine Learning
Dobbe, R., Sondermeijer, O., Fridovich-Keil, D., Arnold, D., Callaway, D., & Tomlin, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2935711 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Turitsyn, K., Sulc, P., Backhaus, S., & Chertkov, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1063-1073
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2087279961
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Options for Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2011.2116750
- The paper
- Turitsyn, K., Sulc, P., Backhaus, S., & Chertkov, M. (2011). Options for Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2011.2116750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.