Cited by 120Optimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid Energy ManagementMicrogrid Control and Optimization

Toward Distributed Energy Services: Decentralizing Optimal Power Flow With Machine Learning

Dobbe, Roel, Sondermeijer, Oscar, Fridovich-Keil, David, Arnold, Daniel, Callaway, Duncan, Tomlin, Claire·2020·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

The implementation of optimal power flow (OPF) methods to perform voltage and power flow regulation in electric networks is generally believed to require extensive communication. We consider distribution systems with multiple controllable Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) and present a data-driven approach to learn control policies for each DER to reconstruct and mimic the solution to a centralized OPF problem from solely locally available information. Collectively, all local controllers closely match the centralized OPF solution, providing near-optimal performance and satisfaction of system constraints. A rate distortion framework enables the analysis of how well the resulting fully decentralized control policies are able to reconstruct the OPF solution. The methodology provides a natural extension to decide what nodes a DER should communicate with to improve the reconstruction of its individual policy. The method is applied on both single- and three-phase test feeder networks using data from real loads and distributed generators, focusing on DERs that do not exhibit intertemporal dependencies. It provides a framework for Distribution System Operators to efficiently plan and operate the contributions of DERs to achieve Distributed Energy Services in distribution networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2019.2935711

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One strategy is to explicitly design local control algorithms; recent work has controlled energy storage and solar inverters using supervised learning techniques trained on historical optimization data.

    “One strategy is to explicitly design local control algorithms; for instance, recent work has controlled energy storage and solar inverters using supervised learning techniques trained on historical optimization data [191,192,410,411].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [192]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobbe, R., Sondermeijer, O., Fridovich-Keil, D., Arnold, D., Callaway, D., & Tomlin, C.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Boston Consulting Group (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2020-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
1296-1306
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W2968135077
Cited by
120
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF CPS FORCES Grant (CNS-1239166)
  • UC–Philippine–California Advanced Research Institute (IIID-2015-10)
  • National Science Foundation (1351900)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
Keywords
optimal power flow, distributed energy resources, decentralized control, rate-distortion analysis, distribution systems, communication topology, data-driven control, distributed generators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review