FORESEEN: Towards Differentially Private Deep Inference for Intelligent Internet of Things
Abstract
In state-of-the-art deep learning, centralized deep learning forces end devices to pool their data in the cloud in order to train a global model on the joint data, while distributed deep learning requires a parameter server to mediate the training process among multiple end devices. However, none of these architectures scale gracefully to large-scale privacy and time-sensitive IoT applications. Therefore, we are motivated to propose a FOg-based pRivacy prEServing dEep lEarNing framework named FORESEEN, so as to achieve scalable, accurate yet private analytics. In FORESEEN, the intermediate fog nodes and the cloud collaboratively perform noisy training of deep neural networks (DNNs), while each end device and its connected fog node collaboratively perform fast, private yet accurate inference. To enhance robustness and ensure privacy, we put forward a collaborative noisy training algorithm and develop a novel representation perturber to perturb the extracted features by combining random projection, random noise addition and data nullification. To meet the required constraints of accuracy, memory and energy in IoT end devices, we build deep models with mixed-precision. Through these sophisticated designs, FORESEEN is able to not only preserve privacy but also maintain comparable inference performance. Extensive experimental results under different datasets, different inference schemes and different noise addition strategies validate the effectiveness of FORESEEN. Moreover, FORESEEN is capable of reducing the communication cost and providing inherent support for robustness and scalability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current FL paradigm is vulnerable to free-riding participants.
“This makes the paradigm vulnerable to freeriding participants [167], [168], [185], [148], [186].”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [185]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215 · see citing works
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578 · see citing works
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244 · see citing works
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000042 · Cited by 5,557 · see citing works
XNOR-Net: ImageNet Classification Using Binary Convolutional Neural Networks
Rastegari, M., Ordonez, V., Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_32 · Cited by 4,408 · see citing works
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3133982 · Cited by 3,956 · see citing works
Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities
Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2584538 · Cited by 2,362 · see citing works
Privacy-preserving deep learning
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813687 · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagations
Courbariaux, M., Bengio, Y., & David, J.-P. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.00363 · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
Dynamic computation offloading for mobile-edge computing with energy harvesting devices
Mao, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2016) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2016.2611964 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
(2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models
McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06963 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Distributed Deep Neural Networks Over the Cloud, the Edge and End Devices
Teerapittayanon, S., McDanel, B., & Kung, H. T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.226 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Fog Computing: Platform and Applications
Yi, S., Hao, Z., Qin, Z., & Li, Q. (2015) · 2015 Third IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb) · doi:10.1109/hotweb.2015.22 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Ding, C., Liao, S., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Liu, N., Zhuo, Y., Wang, C., Qian, X., Bai, Y., Yuan, G., et al. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1145/3123939.3124552 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Notice of Removal: A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Privacy-Preserving Mobile Analytics
Osia, S. A., Shamsabadi, A. S., Sajadmanesh, S., Taheri, A., Katevas, K., Rabiee, H. R., Lane, N. D., & Haddadi, H. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2967734 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
PPFA: Privacy Preserving Fog-Enabled Aggregation in Smart Grid
Lyu, L., Nandakumar, K., Rubinstein, B., Jin, J., Bedo, J., & Palaniswami, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2803782 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationThreats to federated learning A survey
Lyu, L., Yu, H., & Yang, Q. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.02133 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationNot Just Privacy: Improving Performance of Private Deep Learning in Mobile Cloud
Wang, J., Zhang, J., Bao, W., Zhu, X., Cao, B., & Yu, P. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220106 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Multi-tier computing networks for intelligent IoT
Yang, Y. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0195-9 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen Weather Matters: IoT-Based Electrical Load Forecasting for Smart Grid
Li, L., Ota, K., & Dong, M. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700168 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Yu, J., Lukefahr, A., Palframan, D. J., Dasika, G. S., Das, R., & Mahlke, S. A. (2017) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/3140659.3080215 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Fog-Empowered Anomaly Detection in IoT Using Hyperellipsoidal Clustering
Lyu, L., Jin, J., Rajasegarar, S., He, X., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2709942 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy via the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform
Kenthapadi, K., Korolova, A., Mironov, I., & Mishra, N. (2013) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v5i1.625 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Chen, N., Yang, Y., Zhang, T., Zhou, M., Luo, X., & Zao, J. K.-K. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700465 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationFog-Embedded Deep Learning for the Internet of Things
Lyu, L., Bezdek, J. C., He, X., & Jin, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2912465 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationFog-Enabled Intelligent IoT Systems
Yang, Y., Luo, X., Chu, X., et al. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23185-9 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy-preserving machine learning and data aggregation for Internet of Things
Lyu, L. (2018) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge artificial intelligence for 6g: vision, enabling technologies, and applications
Letaief, K. B., Shi, Y., Lu, J., & Lu, J. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2021.3126076 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
“Considering the large-scale privacy-sensitive and delay-sensitive IoT applications, Lyu et al. [159] proposed a hybrid fog-based privacy-preserving DL framework, where a fog-level DNN is partitioned between the edge device and the fog server side.”
BackgroundPrivacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses
Lyu, L., Yu, H., Ma, X., Chen, C., Sun, L., Zhao, J., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3216981 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Self-citationLyu, L., Yu, H., Zhao, J., & Yang, Q. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_1 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Self-citationTask Offloading With Multi-Tier Computing Resources in Next Generation Wireless Networks
Wang, K., Jin, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, T., Nallanathan, A., Tellambura, C., & Jabbari, B. (2023) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2022.3227102 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationCommunication-Efficient and Distributed Learning Over Wireless Networks: Principles and Applications
Park, J., Samarakoon, S., Elgabli, A., Kim, J., Bennis, M., Kim, S.-L., & Debbah, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3055679 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lyu, L., Bezdek, J. C., Jin, J., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2418-2429
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0008
- OpenAlex
- W3035711801
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Basic Research Program of China (YFB0102104)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Key Project Program (61932014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- differential privacy, deep inference, Internet of Things, fog computing, privacy-preserving deep learning, random projections, edge computing, communication cost reduction, scalability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review