Cited by 34Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

FORESEEN: Towards Differentially Private Deep Inference for Intelligent Internet of Things

Lyu, Lingjuan, Bezdek, James C., Jin, Jiong, Yang, Yang·2020·IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications

Abstract

In state-of-the-art deep learning, centralized deep learning forces end devices to pool their data in the cloud in order to train a global model on the joint data, while distributed deep learning requires a parameter server to mediate the training process among multiple end devices. However, none of these architectures scale gracefully to large-scale privacy and time-sensitive IoT applications. Therefore, we are motivated to propose a FOg-based pRivacy prEServing dEep lEarNing framework named FORESEEN, so as to achieve scalable, accurate yet private analytics. In FORESEEN, the intermediate fog nodes and the cloud collaboratively perform noisy training of deep neural networks (DNNs), while each end device and its connected fog node collaboratively perform fast, private yet accurate inference. To enhance robustness and ensure privacy, we put forward a collaborative noisy training algorithm and develop a novel representation perturber to perturb the extracted features by combining random projection, random noise addition and data nullification. To meet the required constraints of accuracy, memory and energy in IoT end devices, we build deep models with mixed-precision. Through these sophisticated designs, FORESEEN is able to not only preserve privacy but also maintain comparable inference performance. Extensive experimental results under different datasets, different inference schemes and different noise addition strategies validate the effectiveness of FORESEEN. Moreover, FORESEEN is capable of reducing the communication cost and providing inherent support for robustness and scalability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsac.2020.3000374

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyu, L., Bezdek, J. C., Jin, J., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Published
2020-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
2418-2429
ISSN
  • 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0008
OpenAlex
W3035711801
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (YFB0102104)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Key Project Program (61932014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
differential privacy, deep inference, Internet of Things, fog computing, privacy-preserving deep learning, random projections, edge computing, communication cost reduction, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review