Fog-Embedded Deep Learning for the Internet of Things
Abstract
In current deep learning models, centralized architecture forces participants to pool their data to the central Cloud to train a global model, while distributed architecture requires a parameter server to mediate the training process. However, privacy issues, response delays, and computation and communication bottlenecks prevent these architectures from working well at the scale of Internet of Things devices. To counter these problems, in this paper we build a Fog-embedded privacy-preserving deep learning framework (FPPDL), which moves computation from the centralized Cloud to Fog nodes near the end devices. The experimental results on benchmark image datasets under different settings demonstrate that FPPDL achieves comparable accuracy to the centralized stochastic gradient descent (SGD) framework, and delivers better accuracy than the standalone SGD framework. Our evaluations also show that both computation and communication cost are greatly reduced by FPPDL, hence achieving the desired tradeoff between privacy and performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CAFE can recover large-scale private data from shared aggregated gradients in VFL settings, overcoming the batch limitation problem in current data leakage attacks.
“They empirically demonstrated that CAFE can recover large-scale private data from the shared aggregated gradients in VFL settings, overcoming the batch limitation problem in current data leakage attacks.”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [182]
CAFE uncovered the risk of catastrophic data leakage in VFL through a novel algorithm that can perform large-batch data leakage with high data recovery quality and theoretical guarantees.
“Another recent work [182] uncovered the risk of catastrophic data leakage in vertical federated learning (CAFE) through a novel algorithm that can perform largebatch data leakage with high data recovery quality and theoretical guarantees.”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [182]
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · see citing works
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578 · see citing works
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000042 · Cited by 5,557 · see citing works
Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning
Netzer, Y. (2024) · doi:10.57702/e7wwo0zk · Cited by 4,261 · see citing works
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3133982 · Cited by 3,956 · see citing works
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2013) · doi:10.1561/9781601988195 · Cited by 3,856 · see citing works
Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space
Johnson, W. B., & Lindenstrauss, J. (1984) · Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/conm/026/737400 · Cited by 2,583 · see citing works
Privacy-preserving deep learning
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813687 · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagations
Courbariaux, M., Bengio, Y., & David, J.-P. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.00363 · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.12 · Cited by 1,936 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning via Additively Homomorphic Encryption
Phong, L. T., Aono, Y., Hayashi, T., Wang, L., & Moriai, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2787987 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Learning IoT in Edge: Deep Learning for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing
Li, H., Ota, K., & Dong, M. (2018) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2018.1700202 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
Random projection in dimensionality reduction
Bingham, E., & Mannila, H. (2001) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/502512.502546 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
(2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Federated Learning of Deep Networks using Model AveragingPreprint
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., & y Arcas, B. A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models
McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06963 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Distributed Deep Neural Networks Over the Cloud, the Edge and End Devices
Teerapittayanon, S., McDanel, B., & Kung, H. T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.226 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Boosting and Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., Rothblum, G. N., & Vadhan, S. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs.2010.12 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Liu, K., Kargupta, H., & Ryan, J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.14 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2694469 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Oblivious multi-party machine learning on trusted processors
Ohrimenko, O., Schuster, F., Cédric Fournet, A., Mehta, A., Nowozin, S., Vaswani, K., & Costa, M. (2016) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 402 · see citing works
PPFA: Privacy Preserving Fog-Enabled Aggregation in Smart Grid
Lyu, L., Nandakumar, K., Rubinstein, B., Jin, J., Bedo, J., & Palaniswami, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2803782 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationDuchi, J. C., Jordan, M. I., & Wainwright, M. J. (2014) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2666468 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Kuo, T.-T., & Lucila Ohno-machado, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.01746 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Crypto-Nets: Neural Networks over Encrypted DataPreprint
Xie, P., Bilenko, M., Finley, T., Gilad-Bachrach, R., Lauter, K., & Naehrig, M. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6181 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Fog-Empowered Anomaly Detection in IoT Using Hyperellipsoidal Clustering
Lyu, L., Jin, J., Rajasegarar, S., He, X., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2709942 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy via the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform
Kenthapadi, K., Korolova, A., Mironov, I., & Mishra, N. (2013) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v5i1.625 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Bounds on the Sample Complexity for Private Learning and Private Data Release
Beimel, A., Kasiviswanathan, S. P., & Kobbi Nissim, B. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11799-2_26 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Deep Learning with Application to Human Activity Recognition
Lyu, L., He, X., Law, Y. W., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3132847.3132990 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationConditional Random Fields for multi-camera object detection
Roig, G., Boix, X., Shitrit, H. B., & Fua, P. (2011) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126289 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Wainwright, M. J., Jordan, M. I., & Duchi, J. C. (2012) · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Federated Learning for IoT Devices
Zhao, Y., Zhao, J., Jiang, L., Tan, R., Niyato, D., Li, Z., Lyu, L., & Liu, Y. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3017377 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses
Lyu, L., Yu, H., Ma, X., Chen, C., Sun, L., Zhao, J., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3216981 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Self-citationLocal Differential Privacy-Based Federated Learning for Internet of Things
Zhao, Y., Zhao, J., Yang, M., Wang, T., Wang, N., Lyu, L., Niyato, D., & Lam, K.-Y. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3037194 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Self-citationLyu, L., Yu, H., Zhao, J., & Yang, Q. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_1 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Self-citationCommunication-Efficient Federated Learning for Wireless Edge Intelligence in IoT
Mills, J., Hu, J., & Min, G. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2956615 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Towards Fair and Privacy-Preserving Federated Deep Models
Lyu, L., Yu, J., Nandakumar, K., Li, Y., Ma, X., Jin, J., Yu, H., & Ng, K. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.2996273 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationFORESEEN: Towards Differentially Private Deep Inference for Intelligent Internet of Things
Lyu, L., Bezdek, J. C., Jin, J., & Yang, Y. (2020) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2020.3000374 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationLarian, H., & Safi-Esfahani, F. (2025) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-024-01388-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lyu, L., Bezdek, J. C., He, X., & Jin, J.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4206-4215
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2941227905
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- fog computing, privacy-preserving deep learning, Internet of Things, distributed deep learning, federated learning, computation-communication trade-off, edge computing, image classification, computation cost reduction, communication cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review