Cited by 65Access Control and TrustAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityCybersecurity and Information Systems

Dynamic Security Computing Framework With Zero Trust Based on Privacy Domain Prevention and Control Theory

Wu, Xiang, Zou, Baowen, Lu, Chuanchuan, Wang, Lili, Zhang, Yongting, Wang, Huanhuan·2025·IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications

Abstract

With a growing security threat in wireless communication networks, a promising method for secure next-generation networks is a zero-trust framework focusing on authentication schemes. How to analyze the risks involved in authentication is a challenge. This study quantifies authentication risks within the zero-trust framework and introduces a privacy domain prevention-control theory. The theory encompasses dynamic privacy risk assessment, intelligent risk classification, and automated selection of privacy protection schemes. First, a dynamic privacy risk assessment method, based on physical entity relationships, is proposed to evaluate all privacy risks. Second, a five-category risk classification method is designed to categorize privacy risks, facilitating the selection of prevention-control schemes, with its rationality mathematically validated. Additionally, an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based method is introduced to guide the optimal selection of prevention-control schemes for various scenarios. Finally, the practical application of the theory in medicine multi-modal computing scene of wireless body area networks demonstrates its effectiveness. The experimental results also show the superiority and feasibility of the proposed methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsac.2025.3560036

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, X., Zou, B., Lu, C., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Published
2025-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
2266-2278
ISSN
  • 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0008
OpenAlex
W4409474274
Cited by
65
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 26
FWCI
113.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC2006600)
  • Key Project of Basic Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province (22KJA120002)
  • Basic Research Project of Universities in Jiangsu Province (23KJD520014)
  • Unveiling and Leading Project of XZHMU (JBGS202204)
  • Xuzhou Science and Technology Program (KC22298)
  • Serving the “343” Industrial Development Project for Universities in Xuzhou (gx2024017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
Keywords
zero-trust architecture, privacy risk assessment, risk classification, wireless body area networks, wireless communication security, analytic hierarchy process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review