The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Information Bottleneck Problem and its Applications in Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
Inference capabilities of machine learning (ML) systems skyrocketed in recent years, now playing a pivotal role in various aspect of society. The goal in statistical learning is to use data to obtain simple algorithms for predicting a random variable Y from a correlated observation X. Since the dimension of X is typically huge, computationally feasible solutions should summarize it into a lower-dimensional feature vector T, from which Y is predicted. The algorithm will successfully make the prediction if T is a good proxy of Y, despite the said dimensionality-reduction. A myriad of ML algorithms (mostly employing deep learning (DL)) for finding such representations T based on real-world data are now available. While these methods are effective in practice, their success is hindered by the lack of a comprehensive theory to explain it. The information bottleneck (IB) theory recently emerged as a bold information-theoretic paradigm for analyzing DL systems. Adopting mutual information as the figure of merit, it suggests that the best representation T should be maximally informative about Y while minimizing the mutual information with X. In this tutorial we survey the information-theoretic origins of this abstract principle, and its recent impact on DL. For the latter, we cover implications of the IB problem on DL theory, as well as practical algorithms inspired by it. Our goal is to provide a unified and cohesive description. A clear view of current knowledge is important for further leveraging IB and other information-theoretic ideas to study DL models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks
Carlini, N., & Wagner, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.49 · Cited by 8,859
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 7×
“Beyond formulating the problem, [16] showed that, when”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (1971) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1116025 · Cited by 2,448
Estimation of entropy and mutual information
Paninski, L. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780272 · Cited by 1,442
Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributions
Pereyra, G., Tucker, G., Chorowski, J., Kaiser, Ł., & Hinton, G. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.06548 · Cited by 655
Why and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: A review
Poggio, T., Mhaskar, H., Rosasco, L., Miranda, B., & Liao, Q. (2017) · International Journal of Automation and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11633-017-1054-2 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning: Methods, metrics, and comparisons
Psaros, A. F., Meng, X., Zou, Z., Guo, L., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2023) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111902 · Cited by 455
Task-Oriented Communication for Multidevice Cooperative Edge Inference
Shao, J., Mao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2022.3191118 · Cited by 209
Semantic Communication: A Survey on Research Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions
Getu, T. M., Kaddoum, G., & Bennis, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3520707 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldfeld, Z., & Polyanskiy, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-38
- ISSN
- 2641-8770 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021450295
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Information Bottleneck Problem and its Applications in Machine Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsait.2020.2991561
- The paper
- Goldfeld, Z., & Polyanskiy, Y. (2020). The Information Bottleneck Problem and its Applications in Machine Learning. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsait.2020.2991561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.