Cited by 559Neural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and Algorithms

Why and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: A review

Open access
Poggio, Tomaso, Mhaskar, Hrushikesh, Rosasco, Lorenzo, Miranda, Brando, Liao, Qianli·2017·International Journal of Automation and Computing

Abstract

The paper reviews and extends an emerging body of theoretical results on deep learning including the conditions under which it can be exponentially better than shallow learning. A class of deep convolutional networks represent an important special case of these conditions, though weight sharing is not the main reason for their exponential advantage. Implications of a few key theorems are discussed, together with new results, open problems and conjectures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11633-017-1054-2

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning models can handle the curse of dimensionality by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function and parallel computations of GPUs.

    “The multivariate evaluation shows another benefit of deep learning models, which is the ability to handle the curse of dimensionality (Bellman, 2010; Keogh and Mueen, 2017) by leveraging different degrees of smoothness in compositional function (Poggio et al., 2017) as well as the parallel computations of the GPUs (Lu et al., 2015).”

    From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Poggio et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. D. L. Donoho. High-dimensional data analysis: The curses and blessings of dimensionality. Lecture -Math Challenges of Century, vol. 13, pp. 178-183, 2000.
  2. E. Corominas, F. S. Balaguer. Conditions for an in- finitely differentiable function to be a polynomial. Revista Matemática Hispanoamericana vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 26-43, 1954. (in Spanish)
  3. R. A. DeVore, R. Howard C. A. Micchelli. Optimal non- linear approximation. Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 469-478, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poggio, T., Mhaskar, H., Rosasco, L., Miranda, B., & Liao, Q.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Poggio, Tomaso
Venue
International Journal of Automation and Computing
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
503-519
ISSN
  • 1476-8186 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8520
OpenAlex
W2550848904
Cited by
559
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 2
FWCI
31.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machine Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Springer US
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1231216)
  • Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-15-1-0385, W911NF-15-1-, W911NF, W911NF-15)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
curse of dimensionality, deep learning, shallow learning, deep convolutional neural networks, parameter sharing, neural network approximation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review