The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weighted-RXD and Linear Filter-Based RXD: Improving Background Statistics Estimation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery
Abstract
Anomaly detection is an active topic in hyperspectral imaging, with many practical applications. Reed-Xiaoli detector (RXD), a widely used method for anomaly detection, uses the covariance matrix and mean vector to represent background signals, assuming that the background information adjusts to a multivariate normal distribution. However, in general, real images present very complex backgrounds. As a result, in many situations, the background information cannot be properly modeled. An important reason is that that background samples often contain also anomalous pixels and noise, which lead to a high false alarm rate. Therefore, the characterization of the background is essential for successful anomaly detection. In this paper, we develop two novel approaches: weighted-RXD (W-RXD) and linear filter-based RXD (LF-RXD) aimed at improving background in RXD-based anomaly detection. By reducing the weight of the anomalous pixels or noise signals and increasing the weight of the background samples, W-RXD can provide better estimations of the background information. In turn, LF-RXD uses the probability of each pixel as background to filter wrong anomalous or noisy instances. Our experimental results, intended to analyze the performance of the newly developed anomaly detectors, indicate that the proposed approaches achieve good performance when compared with other classic approaches for anomaly detection in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery
Kwon, H., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.841487 · Cited by 821
Kraut, S., Scharf, L. L., & McWhorter, L. T. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.890324 · Cited by 734
Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery
Stein, D. W. J., Beaven, S. G., Hoff, L. E., Winter, E. M., Schaum, A. P., & Stocker, A. D. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974730 · Cited by 687
The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT
Kraut, S., & Scharf, L. L. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.782198 · Cited by 606
BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators
Billor, N., Hadi, A. S., & Velleman, P. F. (2000) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(99)00101-2 · Cited by 547
Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery
Chang, C.-I., & Chiang, S.-S. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.800280 · Cited by 540
Farrand, W. (1997) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00080-6 · Cited by 402
Eismann, M. T. (2012) · SPIE eBooks · doi:10.1117/3.899758 · Cited by 396
A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery
Banerjee, A., Burlina, P., & Diehl, C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.873019 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation
Xu, Y., Wu, Z., Li, J., Plaza, A., & Wei, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2493201 · Cited by 602
Self-citationHyperspectral Anomaly Detection With Attribute and Edge-Preserving Filters
Kang, X., Zhang, X., Li, S., Li, K., Li, J., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2710145 · Cited by 469
Self-citationA deep translation (GAN) based change detection network for optical and SAR remote sensing images
Li, X., Du, Z., Huang, Y., & Tan, Z. (2021) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.07.007 · Cited by 396
Graph and Total Variation Regularized Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Cheng, T., & Wang, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2936609 · Cited by 266
Hyperspectral anomaly detection with guided autoencoder
Xiang, P., Ali, S., Jung, S. K., & Zhou, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3207165 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Q., Zhang, B., Ran, Q., Gao, L., Li, J., & Plaza, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2351-2366
- ISSN
- 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-1535
- OpenAlex
- W2040078680
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weighted-RXD and Linear Filter-Based RXD: Improving Background Statistics Estimation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstars.2014.2302446
- The paper
- Guo, Q., Zhang, B., Ran, Q., Gao, L., Li, J., & Plaza, A. (2014). Weighted-RXD and Linear Filter-Based RXD: Improving Background Statistics Estimation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2014.2302446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
