The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery
Abstract
Anomaly detection becomes increasingly important in hyperspectral image analysis, since hyperspectral imagers can now uncover many material substances which were previously unresolved by multispectral sensors. Two types of anomaly detection are of interest and considered in this paper. One was previously developed by Reed and Yu to detect targets whose signatures are distinct from their surroundings. Another was designed to detect targets with low probabilities in an unknown image scene. Interestingly, they both operate the same form as does a matched filter. Moreover, they can be implemented in real-time processing, provided that the sample covariance matrix is replaced by the sample correlation matrix. One disadvantage of an anomaly detector is the lack of ability to discriminate the detected targets from another. In order to resolve this problem, the concept of target discrimination measures is introduced to cluster different types of anomalies into separate target classes. By using these class means as target information, the detected anomalies can be further classified. With inclusion of target discrimination in anomaly detection, anomaly classification can be implemented in a three-stage process, first by anomaly detection to find potential targets, followed by target discrimination to cluster the detected anomalies into separate target classes, and concluded by a classifier to achieve target classification. Experiments show that anomaly classification performs very differently from anomaly detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection
Li, W., & Du, Q. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2343955 · Cited by 758
Zhang, Y., Du, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2479299 · Cited by 485
Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection With Attribute and Edge-Preserving Filters
Kang, X., Zhang, X., Li, S., Li, K., Li, J., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2710145 · Cited by 469
Chang, C.-I. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2020.3021671 · Cited by 355
Self-citationGuo, Q., Zhang, B., Ran, Q., Gao, L., Li, J., & Plaza, A. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2302446 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, C.-I., & Chiang, S.-S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1314-1325
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142552707
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2002.800280
- The paper
- Chang, C.-I., & Chiang, S.-S. (2002). Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2002.800280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.