Cited by 36Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Fully Integrated Reprogrammable CMOS-RRAM Compute-in-Memory Coprocessor for Neuromorphic Applications

Open access
Correll, Justin M., Bothra, Vishishtha, Cai, Fuxi, Lim, Yong, Lee, Seung Hwan, Lee, Seungjong, Lu, Wei D., Zhang, Zhengya, Flynn, Michael P.·2020·IEEE Journal on Exploratory Solid-State Computational Devices and Circuits

Abstract

Analog compute-in-memory with resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices promises to overcome the data movement bottleneck in data-intensive artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. RRAM crossbar arrays improve the efficiency of vector-matrix multiplications (VMMs), which is a vital operation in these applications. The prototype IC is the first complete, fully integrated analog-RRAM CMOS coprocessor. This article focuses on the digital and analog circuitry that supports efficient and flexible RRAM-based computation. A passive 54 × 108 RRAM crossbar array performs VMM in the analog domain. Specialized mixed-signal circuits stimulate and read the outputs of the RRAM crossbar. The single-chip CMOS prototype includes a reduced instruction set computer (RISC) processor interfaced to a memory-mapped mixed-signal core. In the mixed-signal core, ADCs and DACs interface with the passive RRAM crossbar. The RISC processor controls the mixed-signal circuits and the algorithm data path. The system is fully programmable and supports forward and backward propagation. As proof of concept, a fully integrated 0.18μm CMOS prototype with a postprocessed RRAM array demonstrates several key functions of machine learning, including online learning. The mixed-signal core consumes 64 mW at an operating frequency of 148 MHz. The total system power consumption considering the mixed-signal circuitry, the digital processor, and the passive RRAM array is 307 mW. The maximum theoretical throughput is 2.6 GOPS at an efficiency of 8.5 GOPS/W.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jxcdc.2020.2992228

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. chen, 2018, A 65 nm 1 Mb nonvolatile computing-in-memory ReRAM macro with sub-16ns multiply-and-accumulate for binary DNN AI edge processors, IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf (ISSCC) Dig Tech Papers, 494
  2. 10.1109/JSSC.2015.2463094 · DOI
  3. 10.23919/VLSIC.2017.8008562 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/ASSCC.2008.4708780 · DOI
  5. 2016, Overview AltOR32—Alternative Lightweight openRISC CPU openCores
  6. 10.1038/s41928-017-0002-z · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/nnano.2017.83 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/s41928-019-0270-x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662395 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.mejo.2012.10.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/JSSC.2017.2782087 · DOI
  12. zhang, 2016, A machine-learning classifier implemented in a standard 6T SRAM array, Proc IEEE Symp VLSI Circuits (VLSI), 1
  13. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/365202 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Correll, J. M., Bothra, V., Cai, F., Lim, Y., Lee, S. H., Lee, S., Lu, W. D., Zhang, Z., & Flynn, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Apple (United States) (US)
  • Applied Materials (United States) (US)
  • Samsung Electronics (South Korea) (KR)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal on Exploratory Solid-State Computational Devices and Circuits
Published
2020-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
36-44
ISSN
2329-9231 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021223504
Cited by
36
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal on Exploratory Solid-State Computational Devices and Circuits (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
DARPA Unconventional Processing of Signal for Intelligent Data Exploitation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
resistive random access memory, in-memory computing, neuromorphic computing, matrix-vector multiplication, analog computing, mixed-signal circuits, RISC processor, online learning, energy-efficient hardware, backward propagation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review