Cited by 13Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Sim-to-Real in Reinforcement Learning for Everyone

Vacaro, Juliano, Marques, Guilherme, Oliveira, Bruna, Paz, Gabriel, Paula, Thomas, Staehler, Wagston, Murphy, David·2019·2019 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) and 2019 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE)

Abstract

In reinforcement learning (RL), it remains a challenge to have a robotic agent perform a task in the real world for which it was trained in simulation. In this paper, we present our work training a low-cost robotic arm in simulation to move towards a predefined target in space, represented by a red ball in an RGB image, and transferring the capability to the real arm. We exercised the entire end-to-end flow including the 3D modeling of the arm, training of a state-of-the-art RL policy in simulation with multiple actors in a distributed fashion, domain randomization in order to close the sim-to-real gap, and finally the execution of the trained model in the real robot. We also implemented a mechanism to edit the image captured from the camera before sending it to the model for inference, which allowed us to automate reward computation in the physical world. Our work highlights important challenges of training RL agents and moving them to the real world, validating important aspects shown by other works as well as detailing steps not explained by some of them (e.g. how to compute the reward in the real world). The conducted experiments show the improvements observed as the techniques were added to the final solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lars-sbr-wre48964.2019.00060

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Domain randomization and dynamics randomization methods focus on introducing perturbations in simulation environments with the aim of making agents less susceptible to mismatches between simulation and reality.

    “Domain randomization and dynamics randomization methods focus on introducing perturbations in the simulation environments with the aim of making the agents less susceptible to the mismatches between simulation and reality [30], [38], [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vacaro, J., Marques, G., Oliveira, B., Paz, G., Paula, T., Staehler, W., & Murphy, D.
Affiliations
Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US)
Venue
2019 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) and 2019 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
305-310
OpenAlex
W3009584224
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Latin American Robotics Symposium, Brazilian Symposium on Robotics and Workshop on Robotics in Education (LARS/SBR/WRE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
sim-to-real transfer, reinforcement learning, robot manipulators, domain randomization, low-cost robot, distributed training, end-to-end control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review