The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usilng Machine Learning Technliques to Identify Botnet Traffic
Abstract
To date, techniques to counter cyber-attacks have predominantly been reactive; they focus on monitoring network traffic, detecting anomalies and cyber-attack traffic patterns, and, a posteriori, combating the cyber-attacks and mitigating their effects. Contrary to such approaches, we advocate proactively detecting and identifying botnets prior to their being used as part of a cyber-attack (Strayer et al., 2006). In this paper, we present our work on using machine learning-based classification techniques to identify the command and control (C2) traffic of IRC-based botnets - compromised hosts that are collectively commanded using Internet relay chat (IRC). We split this task into two stages: (I) distinguishing between IRC and non-IRC traffic, and (II) distinguishing between botnet and real IRC traffic. For stage I, we compare the performance of J48, naive Bayes, and Bayesian network classifiers, identify the features that achieve good overall classification accuracy, and determine the classification sensitivity to the training set size. While sensitive to the training data and the attributes used to characterize communication flows, machine learning-based classifiers show promise in identifying IRC traffic. Using classification in stage II is trickier, since accurately labeling IRC traffic as botnet and non-botnet is challenging. We are currently exploring labeling flows as suspicious and non-suspicious based on telltales of hosts being compromised
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roughan, M., Sen, S., Spatscheck, O., & Duffield, N. (2004) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1028788.1028805 · Cited by 494
Cited by
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Koroniotis, N., Moustafa, N., Sitnikova, E., & Turnbull, B. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.05.041 · Cited by 1,983
Metadata
- Authors
- Livadas, C., Walsh, R., Lapsley, D., & Strayer, W. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-11
- Pages
- 967-974
- ISSN
- 0742-1303 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988741337
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usilng Machine Learning Technliques to Identify Botnet Traffic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/lcn.2006.322210
- The paper
- Livadas, C., Walsh, R., Lapsley, D., & Strayer, W. T. (2006). Usilng Machine Learning Technliques to Identify Botnet Traffic. Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcn.2006.322210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.