Cited by 494Network Traffic and Congestion ControlInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

Class-of-service mapping for QoS: a statistical signature-based approach to IP traffic classification

Roughan, Matthew, Sen, Subhabrata, Spatscheck, Oliver, Duffield, Nick·2004·Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement

Abstract

The ability to provide different Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees to traffic from different applications is a highly desired feature for many IP network operators, particularly for enterprise networks. Although various mechanisms exist for providing QoS in the network, QoS is yet to be widely deployed. We believe that a key factor holding back widespread QoS adoption is the absence of suitable methodologies/processes for appropriately mapping the traffic from different applications to different QoS classes. This is a challenging task, because many enterprise network operators who are interested in QoS do not know all the applications running on their network, and furthermore, over recent years port-based application classification has become problematic. We argue that measurement based automated Class of Service (CoS) mapping is an important practical problem that needs to be studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1028788.1028805

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roughan, M., Sen, S., Spatscheck, O., & Duffield, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
Publisher
ACM
Published
2004-10-25
Pages
135-148
OpenAlex
W2171634548
Cited by
494
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
FWCI
10.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
quality of service, network traffic classification, enterprise networks, IP networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review