Cited by 3,179Automated Road and Building ExtractionInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net

Open access
Zhang, Zhengxin, Liu, Qingjie, Wang, Yunhong·2018·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Abstract

Road extraction from aerial images has been a hot research topic in the field of remote sensing image analysis. In this letter, a semantic segmentation neural network, which combines the strengths of residual learning and U-Net, is proposed for road area extraction. The network is built with residual units and has similar architecture to that of U-Net. The benefits of this model are twofold: first, residual units ease training of deep networks. Second, the rich skip connections within the network could facilitate information propagation, allowing us to design networks with fewer parameters, however, better performance. We test our network on a public road data set and compare it with U-Net and other two state-of-the-art deep-learning-based road extraction methods. The proposed approach outperforms all the comparing methods, which demonstrates its superiority over recently developed state of the arts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lgrs.2018.2802944

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

4 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. zhou, 2014, Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database, Proc NIPS, 487
  2. mnih, 2012, Learning to label aerial images from noisy data, Proc ICML, 567
  3. ehrig, 2005, Relaxed precision and recall for ontology matching, Proc Workshop Integr Ontol, 25
  4. chollet, 2015, Keras

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z., Liu, Q., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems (CN)
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2018-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
749-753
ISSN
  • 1545-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0571
OpenAlex
W2774320778
Cited by
3,179
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 331 · 2025: 526 · 2024: 616 · 2023: 510 · 2022: 441 · 2021: 342 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 25
FWCI
151.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of China (61601011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Automated Road and Building Extraction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
road extraction, aerial images, semantic segmentation, residual learning, U-Net, skip connections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review