Cited by 51Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Learning to See the Wood for the Trees: Deep Laser Localization in Urban and Natural Environments on a CPU

Open access
Tinchev, Georgi, Penate-Sanchez, Adrian, Fallon, Maurice·2019·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Localization in challenging, natural environments, such as forests or woodlands, is an important capability for many applications from guiding a robot navigating along a forest trail to monitoring vegetation growth with handheld sensors. In this letter, we explore laser-based localization in both urban and natural environments, which is suitable for online applications. We propose a deep learning approach capable of learning meaningful descriptors directly from three-dimensional point clouds by comparing triplets (anchor, positive, and negative examples). The approach learns a feature space representation for a set of segmented point clouds that are matched between a current and previous observations. Our learning method is tailored toward loop closure detection resulting in a small model that can be deployed using only a CPU. The proposed learning method would allow the full pipeline to run on robots with limited computational payloads, such as drones, quadrupeds, or Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2019.2895264

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. li, 0, PointCNN: Convolution on X-transformed points, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 828
  2. 10.1109/iros.2018.8594042 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tinchev, G., Penate-Sanchez, A., & Fallon, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2019-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
1327-1334
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2951349360
Cited by
51
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • EPSRC RAIN and ORCA Robotics Hubs (EP/R026084/1, EP/R026173/1)
  • Royal Society University Research Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
triplet learning, point cloud matching, loop closure detection, forest navigation, urban environment, CPU deployment, lightweight models, robot localization, unmanned ground vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review