Cited by 84Robotic Locomotion and ControlControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Dynamic Locomotion on Slippery Ground

Open access
Jenelten, Fabian, Hwangbo, Jemin, Tresoldi, Fabian, Bellicoso, C. Dario, Hutter, Marco·2019·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Dynamic locomotion on unstructured and uneven terrain is a challenging task in legged robotics. Especially when it comes to slippery ground conditions, common state estimation and control algorithms suffer from the usual no-slip assumption. In fact, there has been only little research on this subject. This paper addresses the problem of slipping by treating slip detection and recovery tasks separately. Our contribution to the former is a probabilistic slip estimator based on aHidden Markov Model. In the second part of this paper, we propose impedance control and friction modulation as useful tools to recover stability during traction loss. We demonstrate the success of our estimation/control architecture by enabling ANYmal, a quadrupedal torque-controllable robot, to dynamically walk over slippery terrain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2019.2931284

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional controllers for legged locomotion are based on elaborate state machines that explicitly trigger the execution of motion primitives and reflexes.

    “Many rely on elaborate state machines that coordinate the execution of motion primitives and reflex controllers [1-5].”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

  • To date, no published work has demonstrated dynamic locomotion in diverse, challenging natural environments as shown in Fig. 1.

    “To date, no published work has demonstrated dynamic locomotion in diverse, challenging natural environments as shown in Fig. 1.”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenelten, F., Hwangbo, J., Tresoldi, F., Bellicoso, C. D., & Hutter, M.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2019-10
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
4170-4176
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2963465704
Cited by
84
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
dynamic locomotion, slippery terrain, legged robots, slip detection, slip estimation, hidden Markov models, impedance control, friction modulation, traction loss, ANYmal, quadrupedal robots, uneven terrain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review