Cited by 969Robotic Locomotion and ControlRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

ANYmal - a highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot

Open access
Hutter, Marco, Gehring, Christian, Jud, Dominic, Lauber, Andreas, Bellicoso, C. Dario, Tsounis, Vassilios, Hwangbo, Jemin, Bodie, Karen +6 more·2016·2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

This paper introduces ANYmal, a quadrupedal robot that features outstanding mobility and dynamic motion capability. Thanks to novel, compliant joint modules with integrated electronics, the 30 kg, 0.5 m tall robotic dog is torque controllable and very robust against impulsive loads during running or jumping. The presented machine was designed with a focus on outdoor suitability, simple maintenance, and user-friendly handling to enable future operation in real world scenarios. Performance tests with the joint actuators indicated a torque control bandwidth of more than 70 Hz, high disturbance rejection capability, as well as impact robustness when moving with maximal velocity. It is demonstrated in a series of experiments that ANYmal can execute walking gaits, dynamically trot at moderate speed, and is able to perform special maneuvers to stand up or crawl very steep stairs. Detailed measurements unveil that even full-speed running requires less than 280 W, resulting in an autonomy of more than 2 h.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2016.7758092

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The controller was used to drive two generations of ANYmal quadrupeds in a variety of conditions that are beyond the reach of prior published work in legged robotics.

    “The controller was used to drive two generations of ANYmal quadrupeds [20] in a variety of conditions that are beyond the reach of prior published work in legged robotics.”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutter, M., Gehring, C., Jud, D., Lauber, A., Bellicoso, C. D., Tsounis, V., Hwangbo, J., Bodie, K., Fankhauser, P., Bloesch, M., Diethelm, R., Bachmann, S., Melzer, A., & Hoepflinger, M.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-10
Pages
38-44
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4250058668
Cited by
969
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6
FWCI
94.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
ANYmal, quadrupedal robots, legged robots, torque control, gait, trotting, stair climbing, outdoor robots, dynamic locomotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review