The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universum Autoencoder-Based Domain Adaptation for Speech Emotion Recognition
Abstract
One of the serious obstacles to the applications of speech emotion recognition systems in real-life settings is the lack of generalization of the emotion classifiers. Many recognition systems often present a dramatic drop in performance when tested on speech data obtained from different speakers, acoustic environments, linguistic content, and domain conditions. In this letter, we propose a novel unsupervised domain adaptation model, called Universum autoencoders, to improve the performance of the systems evaluated in mismatched training and test conditions. To address the mismatch, our proposed model not only learns discriminative information from labeled data, but also learns to incorporate the prior knowledge from unlabeled data into the learning. Experimental results on the labeled Geneva Whispered Emotion Corpus database plus other three unlabeled databases demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method when compared to other domain adaptation methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Wu, Y., & Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271368 · Cited by 27,236
Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390294 · Cited by 7,436
Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction
Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Tsapatsoulis, N., Votsis, G., Kollias, S., Fellenz, W., & Taylor, J. G. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.911197 · Cited by 2,603
A database of German emotional speech
Burkhardt, F., Paeschke, A., Rolfes, M., Sendlmeier, W. F., & Weiss, B. (2005) · Interspeech 2005 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2005-446 · Cited by 2,365
Vision based hand gesture recognition for human computer interaction: a survey
Rautaray, S. S., & Agrawal, A. (2012) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9356-9 · Cited by 1,588
Recent developments in openSMILE, the munich open-source multimedia feature extractor
Eyben, F., Weninger, F. J., Gross, F., & Schuller, B. W. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2502081.2502224 · Cited by 1,265
Self-citationThe INTERSPEECH 2009 emotion challenge
Schuller, B., Steidl, S., & Batliner, A. (2009) · Interspeech 2009 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2009-103 · Cited by 938
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Speech Emotion Recognition Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review
Khalil, R. A., Jones, E., Babar, M. I., Jan, T., Zafar, M. H., & Alhussain, T. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2936124 · Cited by 702
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243
A Review on Speech Emotion Recognition Using Deep Learning and Attention Mechanism
Lieskovská, E., Jakubec, M., Jarina, R., & Chmulík, M. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10101163 · Cited by 246
Domain Adversarial for Acoustic Emotion Recognition
Abdelwahab, M., & Busso, C. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2018.2867099 · Cited by 178
Automated emotion recognition: Current trends and future perspectives
Maithri, M., Raghavendra, U., Gudigar, A., Samanth, J., Barua, P. D., Murugappan, M., Chakole, Y., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106646 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, J., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Fruhholz, S., & Schuller, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Passau (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Letters
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 500-504
- ISSN
- 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2589599921
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Signal Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- BMBF (IKT2020, 16SV7213)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P1_157409/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- speech emotion recognition, domain adaptation, unsupervised domain adaptation, autoencoder, unlabeled data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
